City of Syracuse v. Loomis Armored US, LLC
Plaintiff: City of Syracuse
Defendant: Loomis Armored US, LLC
Case Number: 5:2011cv00744
Filed: July 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Syracuse Office
County: Onondaga
Presiding Judge: Mae A. D'Agostino
Presiding Judge: George H. Lowe
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and the Court further ORDE RS that Plaintiff's claim for "successor liability" is DISMISSED with prejudice; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's breach of contract claims accruing prior to June 8, 2005 are DISMISSED with prejudice; and the Court fu rther ORDERS that Plaintiff's negligence, fraud and conversion claims are DISMISSED with prejudice; and the Court further ORDERS that this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dancks for all further pretrial matters; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/28/12. (ban)
May 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying without prejudice to renew 31 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying without prejudice to renew 35 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants sha ll submit within TWENTY (20) DAYS of the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order supplemental memoranda of law, not to exceed TWENTY(20) PAGES, addressing the jurisdictional concerns set forth above; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff sha ll have TEN (10) DAYS to submit a response to Defendants' submissions, which shall not exceed TWENTY (20) PAGES; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 5/24/12. (ban)
January 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: the Court hereby ORDERS that Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's breach of contract claims accru ing prior to June 8, 2005 are DISMISSED with prejudice; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's breach of contract claims accruing on June 8, 2005 or after are DISMISSED without prejudice; and the Court furtherORDERS that Plaintiff's negligence claims accruing prior to June 8, 2008 areDISMISSED with prejudice; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's negligence claims accruing on June 8, 2008 or after are DISMISSED without prejudice; and the Court further ORDERS that Pl aintiff shall have twenty (20) days from the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order to file an amended complaint; and the Court further ORDERS that if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within twenty (20) days from the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in Defendant's favor and close this case, without any additional action by this Court Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 1/11/12. (ban)
December 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 10 Motion to Remand to State Court. The Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall reset the response and reply deadlines relevant to Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 5); and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 12/15/11. (ban)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: City of Syracuse v. Loomis Armored US, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Loomis Armored US, LLC
Represented By: Jonathan D. Pressment
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: City of Syracuse
Represented By: Jessica M. McKee
Represented By: Suzanne K. Lehman
Represented By: Steven W. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?