Kerrigan et al v. New York State Electric & Gas Corporation et al
| Tammy Kerrigan and Kenneth Kerrigan |
| Verizon Communications, Inc., New York State Electric & Gas Corporation and Comcast Corporation |
| 5:2011cv01320 |
| November 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Tompkins |
| Andrew T. Baxter |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - that Verizon's 72 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and all claims by Kerrigan and cross claims by NYSEG against Verizon are DISMISSED; that NYSEG's 73 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; that Kerrigan's 81 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. That all causes of action except that based on Labor Law § 241(6) and 12 NYCRR § 23-1.29 are DISMISSED. That this case is trial ready and that the clerk issue a trial scheduling order in due course. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 1/5/2015. (jel, )
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That plaintiff's N.Y. Labor Law § 240(1) claim against Comcast (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED as withdrawn. That Comcast's 25 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as premature with leave to renew. That the parties contact Magistrate Judge Baxter to schedule further proceedings in accorance with this Memorandum-Decision and ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 4/25/2012. (jel, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
