Ginsburg v. City of Ithaca et al
Plaintiff: Howard I. Ginsburg
Defendant: Greg Eells, John Doe, Jane Doe, Timothy C. Marchell, City of Ithaca, Cornell University, David J. Skorton and Susan H. Murphy
Case Number: 5:2011cv01374
Filed: November 21, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Syracuse Office
County: Tompkins
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Presiding Judge: David N. Hurd
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 101 MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part Cornell University's 71 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part City of Ithaca's 75 Motion for Summary Judgment; The negligence claims asserted against the defendant City of Ithaca for personal injury and conscious pain and suffering (Fourth and Sixth Cause of Action) are DISMISSED; The negligence claims asserted against defendant Cornell University based on a special "in loco parentis" and contractual relationship (Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Causes of Action) are DISMISSED; The negligence claims asserted against defendant Cornell University based on premises liability for wrongful death and personal injuries/consc ious pain and suffering (First, Second, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action) remain for trial; and The negligence claims asserted against the defendant City of Ithaca based on premises liability for wrongful death (Third and Fifth Causes of Action) remain for trial. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/24/2014. (see)
April 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 DECISION AND ORDER denying defts' 36 and 37 Motions for Reconsideration of 35 Order. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 4/2/12. (cbm ) Modified on 4/3/2012 to correct filing date (cbm ).
March 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER: The defendants' request to convert the motions for judgment on the pleadings into motions for summary judgment is DENIED; The defendants' motions for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED in part and DENIED in pa rt; All claims against defendants David J. Skorton, Susan H. Murphy, Timothy C. Marchell, and Greg Eells are DISMISSED and their names shall be removed from the caption; The Fourteenth Cause of Action is DISMISSED; All causes of action against defendants the City of Ithaca and Cornell University are NOT DISMISSED; and Plaintiff's cross-motion to supplement the pleadings is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/15/2012. (see)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ginsburg v. City of Ithaca et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greg Eells
Represented By: Nelson E. Roth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy C. Marchell
Represented By: Nelson E. Roth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Ithaca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cornell University
Represented By: Nelson E. Roth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David J. Skorton
Represented By: Nelson E. Roth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan H. Murphy
Represented By: Nelson E. Roth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard I. Ginsburg
Represented By: Leland T. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?