Santana v. City of Ithaca, New York et al
| Ramon Santana |
| City of Ithaca, New York and Phyllis Radke |
| 5:2012cv00625 |
| April 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Tompkins |
| Andrew T. Baxter |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 49) is GRANTED and all claims against Radke and the City of Ithaca are DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/19/2014. (jel, )
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That defendants' 23 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: GRANTED as to Santana's claims of gender-based discrimination under the IMC and all claims against Radke in her offic ial capacity. DENIED as to Santana's claims of race-based discrimination under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983, and NYSHRL. That Santana's claims of gender-based discrimination under the IMC and all claims against against Radke in her official capacity are DISMISSED. That defendants file the appropriate responsive pleadings within the time allotted by the rules. That the parties notify Magistrate Judge Baxter in order to schedule further proceedings in accordance with the order. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 5/1/2013. (jel, )
|
|
Filing
21
SUMMARY ORDER - That Santana's 20 Cross-Motion to Amend/Correct is GRANTED. That Santana shall - in accordance with the requirements of, inter alia, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) and N.D.N.Y.L.R. 7.1(a)(4)- file a Second Amended Complaint within thirt y (30) days of this order. That Ithaca and Radke's 18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is DENIED with leave to renew within fourteen (14) days after the filing of the Second Amended Complaint. That, if Ithaca and Radke elect not to challenge the sufficiency of the Second Amended Complaint, they must file the appropriate responsive pleadings within the time allotted by the rules. That, unless defendants renew their motion to dismiss, the parties shall contact Magistrate Judge Baxter to schedule further proceedings in accordance with this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 10/9/2012. (jel, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
