Portaleos v. Shannon
||Adekola Alao, M.D.
||Gina M. Shannon
||September 5, 2012
||New York Northern District Court
||Therese Wiley Dancks
||Lawrence E. Kahn
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 19, 2013
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that the VAs Motion (12-CV-1359 Dkt. No. 8) to vacate is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motions (12-CV-1359 Dkt. No. 13) to consolidate and to compel are DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that th e VAs Motions (12-CV-1652 Dkt. No. 6) for summary judgment and to dismiss are DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (12-CV-1652 Dkt. No. 14) for summary judgment is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs child-custody action is REMANDED to Onondaga County Family Court; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs request for authorized testimony is REMANDED to the VA for reconsideration under all relevant factors within sixty (60) days of the filing of this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on August 19, 2013. (sas)
|September 29, 2014
DECISION and ORDERED, that Petitioner-Plaintiffs Motion (12-CV-1359 Dkt. No. 31) for attorneys fees is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall, within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, file a renewed motion for attorneys fees that complies with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) and includes an explanation for why the motion is timely. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on September 29, 2014. (sas)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.