Reddy v. Catone et al
| Deepika Reddy |
| Louis J. Catone, Donald T. Sheridan, Robert E. Parker, DDS and Richard Konys, Jr. |
| 5:2013cv00707 |
| June 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Onondaga |
| Andrew T. Baxter |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 38 Motion to Vacate. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 11/1/2016. (ban)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim/Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 9) is GRANTED; and the Court furtherORDERS that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; and the Courtfurther ORDERS that Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order; and the Court furtherORDERS that, if Plaint iff does not timely file an amended complaint, the Clerk of the Court is instructed, without further order of the Court, to enter judgment for Defendants and close this case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 6/11/2014. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
