Gutchess Lumber Co., Inc. v. Wieder
| Gutchess Lumber Co., Inc. |
| Michael Wieder |
| 5:2013cv01013 |
| August 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Cortland |
| David E. Peebles |
| Frederick J. Scullin |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting Pltf's 18 Motion to Remand to State Court and denying Pltf's request for an award of atty's fees and costs. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 9/21/13. (sfp, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 12 Motion for an extension of the TRO inthat it will now expire on 9/20/2013, at which time the Court will hear oral argument. Therefore, an expedited motion filing schedule is set. The Court will hear oral argument on 10 MOTIO N to Dismiss the Complaint on 9/20/2013 at 10:00am, in Syracuse. Any opposition to this motion shall be filed by 9/6/2013 and any reply to the opposition to be filed by 9/13/2013. Further, if Plaintiff intends to file a motion to remand, it must be filed by 9/6/2013 with oral argument to be heard on 9/20/2013 at 10:00am. If such a motion is filed, any response is due by 9/13/2013. No reply will be permitted.. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 8/29/2013. (bjw, ) Modified on 8/29/2013 (bjw, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
