Faiaz v. Colgate University et al
| Abrar Faiaz |
| Colgate University, Colgate University Board of Trustees, Jeffrey I. Herbst, Douglas A. Hicks, Christina Khan, Suzy M. Nelson, Marilyn Rugg, Kimberly Taylor, Valerie Brogan, Kevin Alt, Stephen Cook, Jane-Anne Jones, Thaddeus J. Mantaro, Margaret F. Darby, Letta Palmer, Peter Setlak, Daniel Tucker and JOHN DOE |
| 5:2014cv00322 |
| March 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Madison |
| Andrew T. Baxter |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER: that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of this court's November 24, 2014 Memorandum Decision and Order 43 is DENIED. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 03/10/2015. (hmr)
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED, that plaintiff's motion to consider previously unavailable evidence 39 is DENIED and that defendants' motion for partial judgment on the pleadings 21 be DENIED as to plaintiff's cause of ac tion for false imprisonment and for "respondeat superior" as discussed above, and that defendants' motion for partial judgment on the pleadings 21 be GRANTED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, and that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed in its entirety as against defendants KHAN, TUCKER, COOK, HERBST, and DOE. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 11/24/2014. (hmr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
