Shults v. Colvin

Shults v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Amyjo Shults
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	5:2016cv00020
Filed:	January 6, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Syracuse Office
County:	Cayuga
Presiding Judge:	Andrew T. Baxter
Presiding Judge:	David N. Hurd
Nature of Suit:	Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 4, 2016	Filing 21 ORDER: approving the # 20 Stipulation, finding as moot the # 18 Motion for Attorney Fees. The parties Consent to the Award of $5,937.02 in fees payable to the plaintiff in full satisfaction of plaintiff's claim for such fees and expenses. Fees are payable to the plaintiff, but if plaintiff does not owe a debt subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, payable to the attorney. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/4/2016. (jmb)
September 23, 2016	Filing 17 JUDGMENT in favor of Amyjo Shults against Carolyn W. Colvin. It is Ordered that upon Stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED ON CONSENT that the final decision of the Commissioner be and hereby is REVERSED and REMANDED to the defendant for further administrative action pursuant to sentence four of 42 USC section 405(g) for a denovo hearing and new decision. This action is DISMISSED in accord with the decision in Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). (jmb)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 4, 2016

Filing 21 ORDER: approving the # 20 Stipulation, finding as moot the # 18 Motion for Attorney Fees. The parties Consent to the Award of $5,937.02 in fees payable to the plaintiff in full satisfaction of plaintiff's claim for such fees and expenses. Fees are payable to the plaintiff, but if plaintiff does not owe a debt subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, payable to the attorney. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/4/2016. (jmb)

September 23, 2016

Filing 17 JUDGMENT in favor of Amyjo Shults against Carolyn W. Colvin. It is Ordered that upon Stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED ON CONSENT that the final decision of the Commissioner be and hereby is REVERSED and REMANDED to the defendant for further administrative action pursuant to sentence four of 42 USC section 405(g) for a denovo hearing and new decision. This action is DISMISSED in accord with the decision in Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). (jmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shults v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amyjo Shults
Represented By:	E. Kenton Foulke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Karen T. Callahan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?