Beall v. Colvin
Beall and Morgan Christopher Beall |
Colvin and Carolyn W. Colvin |
5:2016cv00092 |
January 25, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Syracuse Office |
Oswego |
Christian F Hummel |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 16 STIPULATION re #15 First MOTION for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C Sect. 2412 by Morgan Christopher Beall submitted to Judge Christian F. Hummel. (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 15 First MOTION for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C Sect. 2412 filed by Morgan Christopher Beall. (Attachments: #1 Affirmation, #2 Exhibit(s) A CPI Table, #3 Exhibit(s) B All Professional Time, #4 Exhibit(s) C Attorney Time, #5 Exhibit(s) D Paralegal Time, #6 Exhibit(s) E Expenses, #7 Exhibit(s) F Costs, #8 Exhibit(s) G Affirmation and Waiver of Direct Payment of EAJA Fees, #9 Memorandum of Law, #10 Certificate of Service) (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 14 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is Granted (Dkt. No. #11 ). The matter is Remanded to the Commissioner for additional proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). The Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. #12 ) is Denied. All pursuant to the #13 Memorandum-Decision and Order of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel, dated the 27th day of March, 2017.(hmr) |
![]() |
Filing 12 DEFENDANT'S BRIEF by Carolyn W. Colvin. (Peck, Jason) |
Filing 11 PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF by Morgan Christopher Beall. Defendant Brief due by 8/4/2016. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 10 MAGISTRATE CONSENT by Morgan Christopher Beall & Carolyn W. Colvin to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel for all further proceedings; Signed by Sr. District Judge Thomas J. McAvoy dtd 5/12/2016 (cml) |
Filing 9 Social Security Administrative Record / Transcript. Plaintiff Brief due by 6/20/2016. (Peck, Jason) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Carolyn W. Colvin. Plaintiff Brief due by 6/20/2016.(Peck, Jason) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Morgan Christopher Beall. Carolyn W. Colvin served on 2/4/2016, answer due 5/16/2016. (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason P. Peck on behalf of Carolyn W. Colvin (Peck, Jason) |
Filing 5 Summonses Issued as to Carolyn W. Colvin, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued for U.S. Attorney General, #2 Summons Issued for U.S. Attorney)(hmr) |
Payment of Civil Filing Fee $400, receipt number 0206-3555690 by Morgan Christopher Beall re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,,, . (Olinsky, Howard) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Social Security Appeal Case Assignment Form and General Order #18 Issued. (hmr) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Notice of Compliance Deadline 2/25/2016 - Plaintiff needs to resubmit a complete IFP Application or pay the filing fee in full. (hmr) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Morgan Christopher Beall. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons for General Counsel, #2 Proposed Summons for U.S. Attorney General, #3 Proposed Summons for U.S. Attorney) Motions referred to Christian F. Hummel. (hmr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carolyn W. Colvin filed by Morgan Christopher Beall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hmr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.