Boyde v. New York State et al
| Johnny W. Boyde |
| New York State, County of Onondaga and City of Syracuse |
| 5:2016cv00555 |
| May 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Onondaga |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 16) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 12) is DISMISSED with prejudice on initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915( e)(2)(B) Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on December 07, 2016. (Copy or order & judgment served via regular and certified mail to Pro Se party and therefore, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(d), an additional 3 (three) days for service may be allowed)(sas)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 5) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); an d it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court forward the Proposed Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 7) to U.S. Magistrate Judge Thrse Wiley Dancks for initial review. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 28, 2016.***A copy of this order was served upon the pro se party by regular US mail. (sas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
