Bradshaw v. Cornell University Long Term Disability Plan et al
| Laurie Bradshaw |
| Cornell University Long Term Disability Plan and Life Insurance Company of New York |
| 5:2016cv01101 |
| September 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Tompkins |
| David E. Peebles |
| Frederick J. Scullin |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT: This case is hereby dismissed and discontinued in its entirety, without costs, and without prejudice to the right of any party to reopen this action within 30 days of the date of this Order if the settlemen t is not consummated. Counsel are directed to file either a Stipulation of Dismissal or a Status Report within 30 days of the date of this Order. Any application to reopen this case must be filed within 30 days of the date of this Order. The dismissa l of this action shall become with prejudice on the thirty first day following the date of this Order unless any party moves to reopen this case within 30 days of the date of this Order upon a showing that the settlement was not consummated or the Court extends the 30 day period prior to its expiration. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 1/4/2017. (nmk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
