Burdick v. Town of Schroeppel et al
||Steven D. Burdick
||Town of Schroeppel, Armen J. Nazarain, Salvatore Lanza, Donald Todd, James G. Cloonan and Oswego County NY
||November 21, 2016
||US District Court for the Northern District of New York
||Mae A. D'Agostino
||Therese Wiley Dancks
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 6, 2017
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 13 Report and Recommendations: The Court hereby ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Dancks' January 31, 2017 Order and Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is ADOPTED to the extent consistent with this Order; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's amended complaint (Dkt. No. 9) is DISMISSED without leave to amend as barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994); and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. 7; 1983 claims against Justice Nazarian, Judge Todd, Lanza, Oswego County, and the Town of Schroeppel are DISMISSED with prejudice, with the exception of Plaintiff's Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial claim, which is DISMISSED without pr ejudice; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 claims against Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in Defendants 9; favor and close this case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 4/6/17. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(ban)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?