Car-Freshner Corporation et al v. American Covers, LLC et al
Car-Freshner Corporation and Julius Samann Ltd. |
American Covers, LLC, Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Energizer Brands, LLC |
5:2017cv00171 |
February 16, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Syracuse Office |
Jefferson |
Andrew T. Baxter |
Thomas J. McAvoy |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 192 STIPULATION AND ORDER: Dismissing the case in its entirety and with prejudice, without costs, attorneys' fees, expenses, or disbursements to any party as against another, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on July 28, 2022. (rep) |
Filing 154 DECISION AND ORDER denying the 137 Motion to Preclude the Expert Reports and Testimony of John G. Plumpe; denying the 138 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting the 139 Motion to Strike the Jury Demand. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 9/30/2021. (amt) |
Filing 127 DECISION & ORDER: that the Defendants' motion for summary judgment, dkt. # 84 , is hereby Granted. Because the Court's decision resolves this matter, Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiffs' jury demand, dkt. # 89 , and Plaintiffs' motion to exclude expert testimony, dkt. # 91 , are hereby Denied as moot. The Clerk of the Court is directed to Close this case.Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 08/07/2019. (hmr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.