Alexander v. City of Syracuse et al
Troy Alexander |
City of Syracuse, County of Onondaga, Detective Gilhooley and Lashauna Monahan |
5:2017cv01195 |
October 28, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Syracuse Office |
Onondaga |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
David N. Hurd |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 147 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 143 Motion for Bill of Costs. ORDERED that 1. Defendants the City of Syracuse and Detective Rory Gilhooleys motion for taxation of costs is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2. Defendants the City of Syracuse and Detective Rory Gilhooleys motion is denied to the extent that they attempt to recover $91.08 in appearance fees for deposition witnesses; and 3. Defendants the City of Syracuse and Detective Rory Gilhooley are awarded $2,464.25 in costs defending this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/7/2022. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(khr) |
Filing 139 JUDGMENT in favor of County of Onondaga against Troy Alexander (Copy served via regular and certified mail) (khr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/7/2022: # 1 Appeal Notice) (khr, ). |
Filing 138 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED that 1. Summary judgment is GRANTED against plaintiff Troy Alexanders claims against defendant the County of Onondaga; and 2. Plaintiff Troy Alexanders complaint is dismissed in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 1/6/2022. (Copy served via regular and certified)(khr) |
Filing 130 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER granting 119 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 129 Letter Request, 119 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by City of Syracuse, City of Syracuse, Detective Gilhooley, Rory Gilhooley. Motion returnable before Judge Hurd., 129 Letter Motion from Defendants City of Syracuse and Rory Gilhooley for City of Syracuse, Rory Gilhooley requesting Date and Time to Review Plaintiff's Exhibit 10 "USB Drive" submitted to Judge Hurd : ORDERED that 1. Defendants the City of Syracuse and Detective Rory Gilhooleys motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff Troy Alexanders complaint is DISMISSED as against defendants the City of Syracuse and Detect ive Rory Gilhooley; 3. Cross claimants the City of Syracuse and Rory Gilhooleys cross claim against cross defendant the County of Onondaga is DISMISSED as moot; 4. Cross claimant the County of Onondagas cross claim against cross defendants the Cit y of Syracuse and Rory Gilhooley is DISMISSED; 5. Defendants the City of Syracuse and Detective Rory Gilhooleys motion to examine certain evidence submitted to the Court by plaintiff Troy Alexander is DENIED as moot; 6. Defendants the City of Syrac use and Detective Rory Gilhooley are DISMISSED from this case; and 7. The remaining parties are ordered to show cause no later than Tuesday, January 4, 2022, why the Court should not grant summary judgment as to the rest of plaintiff Troy Alexanders complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 12/1/2021. (Copy served via regular mail)(khr) |
Filing 51 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 27 Motion for Default Judgment. ORDERED that 1. The City defendants' partial motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; 2. Plaintiff's state law defamation, emotional distress, and constitutional claims are DISMISSED against the City of Syracuse and Detective Gilhooley; 3. Plaintiff's § 1983 municipal liability claims against the City of Syracuse are D ISMISSED; 4. Plaintiff's § 1983 claims for search and seizure, false arrest, and malicious prosecution REMAIN for discovery; 5. Plaintiff's state law claims for false arrest and malicious prosecution REMAIN for discovery; 6. The Cit y defendants' motion to dismiss the County's cross-claim for apportionment of state law tort liability is DENIED; 7. Alexander's motion for entry of default judgment against defendant Monahan is DENIED; 8. The Clerk's entry of d efault against defendant Monahan is VACATED; 9. The City defendants shall file and serve an answer to plaintiff's operative pleading; and 10. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the docket report to conform with the instructions in footnote 1. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 12/13/2018. (khr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.