Horsey v. Tripp et al
| Sherry Horsey |
| Scott Tripp, Terrance Ried and Elizabeth Slater |
| 5:2017cv01356 |
| December 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Onondaga |
| David E. Peebles |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
DECISION AND ORDER that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 49 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 8 ) is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/4/2020. (Plaintiff will receive this electronically through CM/ECF). (sal )
|
|
Filing
9
DECISION AND ORDER accepting and adopting # 5 Magistrate Judge Peebles' Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 8 ) is referred to Magistrate Judge Peebles for his review of its pleading suffici ency pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e). If Plaintiff's Amended Complaint has not corrected the pleading defects identified by Magistrate Judge Peebles in his Report-Recommendation (and/or if it asserts new claims plagued by other pleading defects), Plaintiff's action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice, upon Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Peebles. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/5/18. (lmw) (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
