Baker v. The Peters Family Madison County DSS et al
| Roderick I. Baker, Jr. |
| The Peters Family Madison County DSS, The Northop Family and Chihenango Police Dept. |
| 5:2019cv00259 |
| February 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Andrew T Baxter |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP Application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either (1) pay the full $400.00 filing fee for civil actions or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate official at his facility. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/25/19. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
|
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:19-cv-00641. electronically transferred when case opened |
| Mailed a copy of #4 Transfer Order N.D.N.Y. (Complaint)(case opening only), to Roderick I. Baker, Jr. DIN No. 07-B-0571 Fishkill Correctional Facility P.O. Box 1245 Beacon, NY 12508. (vba) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/22/2019.] |
|
Filing 4
TRANSFER ORDER. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action under 28 U.S.C. 1406 to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The Clerk of Court is further directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court, and this order closes the case in this Court. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 2/14/2019) (rjm). Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/22/2019.]
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (rjm) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/22/2019.] |
| Filing 3 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Roderick I. Baker, Jr.(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/22/2019.] |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Chihenango Police Dept., The Northop Family, The Peters Family Madison County DSS. Document filed by Roderick I. Baker, Jr.(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/22/2019.] |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Roderick I. Baker, Jr.(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/22/2019.] |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 2/22/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
