Pendergraph v. City of Syracuse et al
Valerie Pendergraph |
Officer JOHN DOE, City of Syracuse and Officer JANE DOE |
5:2019cv00291 |
March 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
Lawrence E Kahn |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER Rescheduling the Rule 16 Initial Conference: The telephone Initial Conference has been RESCHEDULED for 5/22/2019 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the call as directed in General Order 25. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed no later than 5/15/2019 and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 5/15/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 4/22/2019. (sg) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint (Supplemental Complaint, Dkt. No. 4) by City of Syracuse, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE.(Long, Todd) |
CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY: The clerk replaced the #4 Supplemental Complaint with a corrected version to fix the spelling of the plaintiff's name on the last page of the Complaint. (rep) |
Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Valerie Pendergraph. (Carroll, Woodruff) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT against City of Syracuse, et al. filed by Valerie Pendergraph. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet corrected)(Carroll, Woodruff) Modified on 3/26/2019 to clarify docket text as to who the Complaint was filed against (rep). (Main Document 4 replaced on 3/26/2019 with corrected version that has plaintiff's last name spelled correctly on the last page) (rep). |
CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY - Clerk replaced documents 2 & 3 with corrected versions. Clerk emailed corrected documents 2 & 3 to Attorney Carroll. (sfp, ) Attorney Carroll is directed to submit a corrected copy of the "Wherefore Clause" of the complaint referencing the correct spelling of plaintiff's last name. Modified on 3/6/2019 to add wording about corrected complaint to follow. (jmb) |
TEXT NOTICE: Although the plaintiff herein has named John/Jane Doe's in the Complaint, the Clerk's Office will not issue summonses for service of process on a "Jane/John Doe" defendant at this time. In the event plaintiff wishes to pursue claims against these defendants, plaintiff shall take reasonable steps to ascertain their identities. When plaintiff determines the identity of the "Jane/John Doe" defendants, plaintiff may seek to amend the pleading to add the properly named defendants pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 15 and summons will be issued at that time.(rep) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 6/4/2019 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks by telephone. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 5/28/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (rep) (Main Document 3 replaced on 3/6/2019) (sfp, ). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to City of Syracuse. (rep) (Main Document 2 replaced on 3/6/2019) (sfp, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT: Against City of Syracuse, JANE DOE, and JOHN DOE (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4667637), filed by Valerie Pendergraph. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.