Tillotson v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Tina Beth Tillotson
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 5:2019cv00579
Filed: May 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Referring Judge: Frederick J Scullin
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF VOLUNTARILY DISMISSAL OF MANDAMUS ACTION. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 7/12/2019. (bjw, )
July 11, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw Mandamus Action filed by Tina Beth Tillotson. Motions referred to Therese Wiley Dancks. (Palmer, Melissa)
June 11, 2019 TEXT NOTICE: Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus due by 7/22/2019. (sg)
June 5, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tina Beth Tillotson. (Palmer, Melissa)
May 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ORDER : Court has issued summonses. (Dkt. No. #4 .) Plaintiff is directed to effectuate service of process upon defendant and file the appropriate proofs of service once complete. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 5/16/2019. (sg)
May 16, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, and SSA Office of General Counsel on 5/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Summons as to U.S. Attorney #2 Summons as to Office of General Counsel.(sg)
May 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis of Tina Beth Tillotson: The Court having considered Plaintiff's application to proceed without prepayment of fees under 28 U.S.C. 1915 (Dkt. No. #2 ), it is hereby ORDERED, that the application is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to issue the summonses. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Dkt. No. #1 ) will be addressed by the District Court. **Plaintiff should note that, although the application to proceed in forma pauperis has been granted, Plaintiff will still be required to pay fees that Plaintiff incurs in this action, including copying and/or witness fees. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 5/16/2019. (sg, )
May 14, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tina Beth Tillotson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons U.S. Attorney General, #2 Proposed Summons General Counsel, #3 Proposed Summons U.S. Attorney) Motions referred to Therese Wiley Dancks. (see) (Attachment 1 replaced on 5/16/2019) (sg, ). (Attachment 2 replaced on 5/16/2019) (sg, ). (Attachment 3 replaced on 5/16/2019) (sg, ).
May 14, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus filed by Tina Beth Tillotson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (see)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tillotson v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Beth Tillotson
Represented By: Melissa A. Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?