Knight v. County of Cayuga et al
Julie Knight and Julie Delaney |
County of Cayuga, Kathleen Cuddy, Cayuga County Health Department, Nancy Purdy and Michael Russell |
5:2019cv00712 |
June 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
David N Hurd |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Letter Requesting extension of time to respond to the #5 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint specific paragraphs thereof: Motion Hearing is reset for 9/13/2019 at 10:00 AM in Utica before Judge David N. Hurd. Response to Motion due by 8/27/2019. Reply to Response to Motion due by 9/3/2019. So Ordered by Judge David N. Hurd on 7/30/2019. (see) |
Filing 7 Letter Motion from Jarrod W Smith Esq for Julie Knight requesting Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss submitted to Judge Hurd . (Smith, Jarrod) |
***Answer due date updated for Cayuga County Health Department answer due 7/17/2019; County of Cayuga answer due 7/17/2019; Kathleen Cuddy answer due 7/17/2019; Nancy Purdy answer due 7/17/2019. (hmr) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Cayuga County Health Department, County of Cayuga, Kathleen Cuddy, Nancy Purdy, Michael Russell re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint, specific paragraphs thereof (Spagnoli, Charles) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction , MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint, specific paragraphs thereof Motion Hearing set for 8/23/2019 10:00 AM in Utica before Judge David N. Hurd Response to Motion due by 8/6/2019 Reply to Response to Motion due by 8/12/2019. filed by Cayuga County Health Department, County of Cayuga, Kathleen Cuddy, Nancy Purdy, Michael Russell. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Lacey Bailey, #2 Exhibit(s) 1 (first notice of claim), #3 Exhibit(s) 2 (second notice of claim), #4 Exhibit(s) 3 (third notice of claim), #5 Affidavit of Michael Russell, #6 Memorandum of Law) Motions referred to Therese Wiley Dancks. (Spagnoli, Charles) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Cty of Cayuga, Cay Health Dept., Cuddy and Purdy on 6/26/2019, filed by Julie Knight. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Affidavit)(Smith, Jarrod) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 9/19/2019 at 10:30 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 9/12/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (hmr) |
Filing 2 Summonses Issued as to Cayuga County Health Department, County of Cayuga, Kathleen Cuddy, Nancy Purdy, Michael Russell. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued for Cayuga County Health Department, #2 Summons Issued for Nancy Purdy, #3 Summons Issued for Kathleen Cuddy, #4 Summons Issued for Michael Russell)(hmr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Cayuga County Health Department, County of Cayuga, Kathleen Cuddy, Nancy Purdy, Michael Russell (Filing fee $400 receipt number BNYNDC-4771882) filed by Julie Knight. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hmr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.