Odom v. Syracuse City School District et al
Kamala Odom |
Syracuse City School District, Syracuse City School District Board of Education and Jeffrey Bellamy |
5:2019cv00835 |
July 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Andrew T Baxter |
Thomas J McAvoy |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: All conferences will be conducted by telephone unless the parties are specifically directed to appear. Counsel for the plaintiff is directed to coordinate the initial conference call. Once all parties are on the conference line, Judge Baxters chambers can be reached at 315-234-8600. Initial Conference set for 11/6/2019 10:00 AM in Syracuse before US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 10/30/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (khr) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Syracuse City School District. (Attachments: #1 Summons issued as to Syracuse City School District Board of Education, #2 Summons issued as to Jeffrey Bellamy)(khr) |
Filing 5 DECISION AND ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ORDERED, that plaintiffs motion to proceed IFP (Dkt. No. 2, as corrected by Dkt. No. 4) is GRANTED for all relevant purposes,1 and it is ORDERED, that the Clerk shall issue the summonses and forward them, along with a copy of the complaint and a packet containing General Order 25, which sets forth the Civil Case Management Plan used by the Northern District of New York, to the United States Marshal for service upon the named defendants, and it is further ORDERED, that a formal response to plaintiffs complaint be filed by the defendants or defendants counsel as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure subsequent to service of process on the defendants, and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk is directed to schedule a Rule 16 conference before me. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 8/7/2019. (khr) |
CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY re #4 Amended Document. The original documents contained personal identifiers. Replaced with a redacted copy. (khr) |
Filing 4 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Kamala Odom. Amendment to #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 3 Order, Supplemental IFP Application. (Smith, Jarrod) (Main Document 4 replaced on 8/5/2019) (khr, ). |
Filing 3 TEXT ORDER: re #2 plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended IFP application, on or before 7/31/2019, to include supplemental information about her income. So Ordered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 7/19/2019. (nmk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kamala Odom. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to Syracuse City School District, #2 Proposed Summons as to Syracuse City School District Board of Education, #3 Proposed Summons as to Jeffrey Bellamy) Motions referred to Andrew T. Baxter. (khr) (Main Document 2 replaced on 7/15/2019) (khr, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Jeffrey Bellamy, Syracuse City School District, Syracuse City School District Board of Education filed by Kamala Odom. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(khr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.