Fournier et al v. Anderson et al
V.G., Jr. and Marissa A. Fournier |
Police Officer C. Lambertson, Onondaga County Justice Center, Judge Karen Uplinger, Correction Officers Jane Does and John Does 1 through 100, Detective Abrams, City of Syracuse Police Department, Police Officers Jane Does and John Does 1 through 100, P.O. Taylor Anderson, Onondaga County District Attorney's Office and Frank L. Fowler |
5:2019cv00930 |
July 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
Frederick J Scullin |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 12 ***SEALED DOCUMENT SUPPORTING EXHIBITS: filed by Marissa A. Fournier, Pro Se. (jmb) |
Filing 11 ***STRICKEN pursuant to the 10/17/2019 Text Order of Magistrate Judge Dancks***SEALED MOTION filed by Marissa A. Fournier to Seal Supporting Exhibits. (jmb) Modified on 10/18/2019 (sg, ). |
Filing 10 **STRICKEN pursuant to the 10/17/2019 Text Order of Magistrate Judge Dancks***Letter Motion dated 10/16/2019 filed by Marissa A. Fournier, Pro Se requesting that the Court support her request for a written apology from the School District, submitted to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. (jmb) Modified on 10/18/2019 (sg, ). |
Filing 9 Letter Motion from Todd M. Long for City of Syracuse Police Department requesting apprising the Court of Plaintiffs' failure to comply with the Court's ordered deadline to file a complaint and proposed summonses as directed in Dkt. No. 4, and requesting that Your Honor report and recommend administrative closure of this case submitted to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks . (Long, Todd) |
![]() |
Filing 7 Letter Motion from Angel A. Castro, III, Esq. for Marissa A. Fournier requesting Enlargement of Time submitted to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks . (Castro, Angel) |
Filing 6 STATUS REPORT regarding Plaintiffs' compliance with the Court's Order (Dkt. No. 4) by City of Syracuse Police Department. (Long, Todd) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Leigh A. Lieberman on behalf of City of Syracuse Police Department (Lieberman, Leigh) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Letter Motion from Todd M. Long for City of Syracuse Police Department requesting adjournment to G.O. 25 Filing Order submitted to Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. Senior U.S. District Court Judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - July 30, 2019 Demand for a Complaint, pursuant to N.D.N.Y. Local Rule 5.1(h), with a certificate of service)(Long, Todd) |
Filing 2 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Telephone Conference set for 9/3/2019 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 8/27/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (jmb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL: from NYS Supreme Court, County of Onondaga, case number 003499-2019 (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4816205) filed by Todd M. Long, Esq., on behalf of City of Syracuse Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Summons with Notice, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Appearance, #3 Exhibit C - Demand for Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Notice of Filing of Removal, #5 Certificate of Service, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(jmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.