Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff: Sharon Wood
Defendant: Secretary of Health and Human Services
Case Number: 5:2019cv01122
Filed: September 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Referring Judge: David N Hurd
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT NOTICE TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF: Because Plaintiff has paid the filing fee, they are responsible for serving the summons, complaint, and General Order 25 (which have been sent to Plaintiff for this purpose) on each defendant in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c). A separate affidavit of service as to each defendant must be filed. Plaintiff is warned that failure to serve the summons, complaint, and General Order 25 on Defendant or ask for an extension of time to do so (in writing) may ultimately result in dismissal of their action for failure to prosecute. (copy of this text notice served on pro se party via regular mail. ) (sg)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Clerk mailed Dkt. No. #2 Summonses Issued and Dkt. No. #3 - G.O. #25 to pro se plaintiff on 9/11/2019. (hmr)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE mailed to Sharon Wood, along with the pro se packet and a note to read, sign and return the notice and that the extra copy of the notice and pro se packet are for her to keep, on 9/11/2019 via regular mail. (hmr)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 12/11/2019 at 09:30 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/4/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (hmr)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summonses Issued as to Secretary of Health and Human Services. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued for United States Attorneys, #2 Summons Issued for Attorney General of the United States)(hmr)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Secretary of Health and Human Services (Filing fee $400 receipt number UTC003118) filed by Sharon Wood. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope, #3 Envelope)(hmr)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number UTC003118 (hmr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Secretary of Health and Human Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?