Shenk v. State University of New York (SUNY) at Cortland
| Timothy J. Shenk, Sr. |
| State University of New York (SUNY) at Cortland |
| 5:2019cv01287 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Andrew T Baxter |
| David N Hurd |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 OBJECTION to #6 Report and Recommendations by Timothy J. Shenk, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (dpk) |
Filing 6
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Timothy J. Shenk. Sr. ORDERED that pltf's #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED FOR PURPOSES OF FILING ONLY; RECOMMENDED, that pltf's complaint be DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE; and ORDERED that pltf's #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. ( Objections to R&R due by 12/2/2019, Case Review Deadline 12/4/2019) Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 11/13/2019. (Copy served upon Timothy Shenk, Sr., via regular mail on 11/14/2019)(see)
|
| Filing 5 Acknowledgment of Receipt of #4 Pro Se Handbook and Notice by Timothy Shenk on 10/31/2019. (dpk) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE: Clerk mailed the Pro Se Plaintiff a Pro Se Notice, Pro Se Handbook and a copy of the Local Rules and directed the Plaintiff to sign the Notice and return the signed copy to the Court. (pjh) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Timothy J. Shenk, Sr. Motions referred to Andrew T. Baxter. (dpk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Timothy J. Shenk, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to State University of New York at Cortland) Motions referred to Andrew T. Baxter. (dpk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State University of New York (SUNY) at Cortland filed by Timothy J. Shenk, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit AA, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit G-1, #11 Exhibit H, #12 Exhibit I, #13 Exhibit J, #14 Exhibit K, #15 Exhibit L, #16 Exhibit M, #17 Exhibit M-1, #18 Exhibit N, #19 Exhibit O, #20 Exhibit P, #21 Exhibit Q, #22 Exhibit R, #23 Exhibit R-1, #24 Exhibit S, #25 Exhibit T, #26 Exhibit U, #27 Exhibit V, #28 Exhibit W, #29 Exhibit X, #30 Exhibit Y, #31 Exhibit Z, #32 Exhibit Z-1, #33 Exhibit Z-2, #34 Civil Cover Sheet, #35 Mailing Envelope) (dpk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shenk v. State University of New York (SUNY) at Cortland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State University of New York (SUNY) at Cortland | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy J. Shenk, Sr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
