Jackson v. STF Services Corp. et al
| Jeffrey S. Jackson |
| JOHN DOE, Bloomberg L.P., Bloomberg Industry Group, STF Services Corp., Bloomberg BNA, The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. and Michael Bloomberg |
| 5:2019cv01326 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 76
TEXT ORDER denying #75 Plaintiff's letter-motion requesting leave to withdraw his appeal. Because Plaintiff's appeal has already been docketed by the Circuit Clerk (20-597), the district court no longer has jurisdiction to dismiss his appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(a). Plaintiff is respectfully advised to resubmit his motion to the Court of Appeals. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/21/2020. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular mail). (sal )
|
| Filing 75 Letter Motion from Jeffrey S. Jackson, Pro Se requesting to withdraw the appeal submitted to Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby. (pjh) |
| Filing 74 ELECTRONIC NOTICE AND CERTIFICATION sent to U.S. Court of Appeals regarding the #73 Notice of Appeal. {Clerk served a copy of this Notice upon the Pro Se Plaintiff via regular mail} (pjh) |
| Filing 73 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to the #71 BAR ORDER by Jeffrey S. Jackson. No filing fee paid. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pjh) |
| Filing 72 JUDGMENT that, pursuant to the Bar Order issued on January 8, 2020 (Dkt. No. #71 ) issued by Chief District Judge Glenn T. Suddaby, Plaintiff is BARRED from filing pro se any future motions or documents in this action without first obtaining leave of the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651(a) and the Court's inherent authority to control and manage its own docket so as to prevent abuse in its proceedings. Defendant Bureau of National Affairs' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. #51 ) is DENIED without prejudice as moot. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. #27 ) is sua sponte DISMISSED without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and/or comply with Orders of this Court. The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this action, and reopen it only upon the filing of a notice of appearance by counsel for Plaintiff (or an Order of the Court granting Plaintiff leave to proceed pro se); and it is further CERTIFIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Bar Order would not be taken in good faith. All of the above pursuant to the Order of the Honorable Glenn T. Suddaby, dated this 8th day of January, 2020. Dkt. No. #71 . (Copy served upon plaintiff via certified and regular mail). (sal ) |
|
Filing 71
BAR ORDER: : Plaintiff is hereby BARRED from filing pro se any future motions or documents in this action without first obtaining leave of the Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651(a) and the Court's inherent authority to control and manage its own docket so as to prevent abuse in its proceedings. Defendant Bureau of National Affairs' motion to dismiss (Dkt. #51 ) is DENIED without prejudice as moot. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. #27 ) is sua sponte DISMISSED without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and/or comply with Orders of this Court. The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this action, and reopen it only upon the filing of a notice of appearance by counsel for Plaintiff (or an Order of theCourt granting Plaintiff leave to proceed pro se). CERTIFIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Bar Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 1/8/2020. (Copy served upon plaintiff by regular and certified mail). (sal )
|
| Filing 70 PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF CROSS-MOTION for Order permitting him to serve his papers on Defendant's attorney under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(1) filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sal ) |
| Filing 69 Letter from Jeffrey S. Jackson dated December 17, 2019 submitting proof of service together with various submissions to the Court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pjh) |
| Filing 68 NOTICE OF CROSS MOTION to Amend or Supplement Pleadings or for or Interpleader and Motion to Sanction filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson (pjh) |
| Filing 67 NOTICE OF CROSS MOTION for New Injunctions Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Motion for a Summary Judgement under Local Rule 7.1 with Supporting Statement of Material Facts filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson (pjh) |
| Filing 66 NOTICE OF CROSS MOTION to Review Defendant Motions and Apply Sanctions for Vexatious Filing of Motions filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson (pjh) |
| Filing 65 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Greg McCaffrey from Complaint and General Affidavit in Support filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson. (pjh) |
| Filing 64 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Michael Bloomberg from Complaint and General Affidavit in Support filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson. (pjh) |
|
Filing 63
TEXT ORDER denying #58 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion to Amend and #61 his Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order as procedurally improper (for the reasons stated above in Dkt. No. 28 and in the Text Notice filed on 11/26/2019) and as barred by the law-of-the-case doctrine (given the Court's rulings in Dkt. Nos. 28 and 35 ), and directing him to SHOW CAUSE in writing, within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the date of this Text Order, why he should not be BARRED from making any future filings in this action pro se, and thus why this action should not be DISMISSED without prejudice, until he proceeds through counsel in this action, due to his vexatious litigation conduct in this action thus far. That vexatious conduct includes, but is not limited to, the following: (1) ignoring the Court's directive to provide to the Court summonses for issuance by the Court (see Dkt. Nos. 21 , 29 , 41 , #60 ); (2) repeatedly mislabeling motions as returnable before U.S. District Judge Brenda K. Sannes (see Dkt. Nos. #23 , #24 , #25 , #30 , #31 , #32 , #33 , #37 ) despite the fact that he knows, or reasonably should know, that on October 31, 2019, the case was reassigned to the undersigned (Dkt. No. 9 ), causing confusion to Court staff; (3) repeatedly filing procedurally improperly motions without a memorandum of law and affidavit (see Dkt. Nos. #23 , #24 , #25 , #33 , #42 , #43 , #44 , #45 , #58 , and #61 ), despite the fact that he knows, or reasonably should know, of that procedural impropriety (given Dkt. No. 28 , the Text Notice filed on 11/26/2019, and his receipt of a courtesy copy of Local Rule 7.1 and pages 35 and 36 of the District's Pro Se Handbook on Nov. 6, 2019, see Dkt. No. #22 ), wasting the precious resources of the Court, which has a congested docket; and (4) filing motions that he knows, or reasonably should know, to be without cause given the Court's prior rulings (as referenced above). The Court notes that on 11/26/2019 it specifically cautioned that, "if he continues to file such abusive and/or vexatious motions in this action, he will be ordered to show cause why he should not be barred from proceeding without counsel in this action." (Text Notice filed 11/26/2019.) Yet, his vexatious conduct has continued. (Dkt. Nos. #58 and #61 .) Under the circumstances, the Court finds Plaintiff's conduct to be vexatious and unnecessarily burdensome to the Court, Plaintiff's motive to be lacking in good faith, and other sanctions to be inadequate to protect the Court and Plaintiffs opposing parties. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 12/23/2019. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular mail). (sal)
|
| Filing 62 MEMORANDUM OF LAW re #51 Motion to Dismiss,,,, /REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6), AND TO ENJOIN PLAINTIFF FROM BRINGING FURTHER DUPLICATIVE ACTIONS filed by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Garland, David) |
| Filing 61 MOTION for Temporary Order of Protection with attachment filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motion referred to Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby. (pjh) |
| Filing 60 Letter from Jeffrey S. Jackson, Pro Se enclosing Process Server Invoice, Business Entity Details, and Affidavits of Service. {Clerk notes that related case number 5:19-cv-1281 is referenced in this letter, but the Pro Se Plaintiff states that service was made regarding this case, however there was no Complaint filed in either case on 11/11/2019 as stated in the letter. Summonses have not been issued in this case}. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pjh) |
| Filing 59 Letter from Jeffrey Jackson enclosing Affidavits of Service. (Attachments: #1 Affidavits of Service){Clerk notes that the letter is in reference to related case number 5:19-cv-1281. The Clerk also notes that the Affidavits of Service enclosed with the letter are proof of service of the Response to the Motion to Dismiss and there is no Motion to Dismiss pending in 5:19-cv-1281}.(pjh) |
| Filing 58 NOTICE OF CROSS-MOTION to Amend or Supplement Pleadings or for or Interpleader and Motions to Sanction filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson. Motions referred to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. (pjh) |
| Filing 57 RESPONSE to the #51 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson. {Clerk notes that the numbering of the document is not consistent, however this is how the document was received}. (pjh) |
|
Filing 56
TEXT ORDER denying #55 Plaintiff's letter-motion without prejudice as unsupported by a showing of cause. Plaintiff is respectfully advised that there is no "motion scheduled for the week of December 2, 2019." Rather, there is a motion to dismiss pending in this action which he must respond to by the end of 12/16/2019; after Defendants file a reply by the end of 12/23/2019, the motion will be decided based on the papers (without oral argument). Plaintiff is also respectfully advised that he should continue to attempt to serve his response on all Defendants until he is successful; more importantly, he should file that response with the Court. Finally, Plaintiff is respectfully advised that, if he did not file the Complaint in this action, then he should have no objection to the dismissal of that Complaint (a fact that he can state in his response). SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 12/9/2019. (Served plaintiff by regular mail). (sal )
|
| Filing 55 Letter Motion filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson requesting a telephone conference submitted to Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service by Mail of the Response to Motion to Dismiss, #2 Attachment to Letter Motion, #3 Envelope)(pjh) |
| TEXT NOTICE regarding Motion #51 to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and to Enjoin Plaintiff from bringing Further Duplicative Actions: Plaintiff's Response to this motion is due to be filed on or before 12/16/2019. Any reply is due on or before 12/23/2019. This motion is taken on submission of the papers and returnable before Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby. No appearances are required. (Served plaintiff by regular mail). (sal ) |
| Filing 54 NOTICE by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. re #51 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and to Enjoin Plaintiff from bringing Further Duplicative Actions (Garland, David) |
| Filing 53 NOTICE by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. re #51 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and to Enjoin Plaintiff from bringing Further Duplicative Actions (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Complaint)(Garland, David) |
| Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OF LAW re #51 Motion to Dismiss,,,, filed by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.. (Garland, David) |
| Filing 51 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and to Enjoin Plaintiff from bringing Further Duplicative Actions filed by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Declaration of Demedre R. Heulett in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and to Enjoin Plaintiff from bringing Further Duplicative Actions, #3 Exhibit(s) A - Charge No. 10194371, #4 Exhibit(s) B - Charge No. 10194885, #5 Exhibit(s) C - Charge No. 10194892, #6 Exhibit(s) D - Charge No. 10194371, #7 Exhibit(s) E - Division's November 2, 2018 Annulment Determination, #8 Exhibit(s) F - Right-to-Sue Notices issued by the EEOC on December 17, 2018, #9 Exhibit(s) G - Right-to-Sue Notices issued by the EEOC on February 12, 2019, #10 Exhibit(s) H - Complaint, #11 Exhibit(s) I - Complaint) (Garland, David) |
| Filing 50 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Notice of Appearance of Kevin R. Vozzo, dated November 26,2019, and the Notice of Appearance of Jennifer M. Horowitz, dated November 26, 2019 served on Jeffrey S. Jackson on 11/26/19, filed by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.. (Horowitz, Jennifer) Modified on 11/27/2019 to correct the spelling of the attorney's name (pjh). |
| Filing 49 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Notice of Appearance of Kevin R. Vozzo, dated November 5,2019, and the Notice of Appearance of David W. Garland, dated November 5,2019 served on Jeffrey S. Jackson on 11/26/19, filed by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.. (Horowitz, Jennifer) Modified on 11/27/2019 to correct the spelling of the attorney's name (pjh). |
|
Filing 48
TEXT ORDER: Court has reviewed Plaintiff's letter motions (Dkt. Nos. #37 , #38 , #42 , #43 , #44 , #45 ) which are all denied at this time for the following reasons. Dkt. No. #37 seeks to "refute the testimony provided by Demedre R. Heulett" which presumably refers to the Heulett affidavit at Dkt. No. #11 submitted in support of Defendant The Bureau of National Affairs' ("Defendant") original motion to dismiss at Dkt. No. #10 . Since Defendan's motion to dismiss has been withdrawn (see Dkt. Nos. #36 , 39 ), Plaintiff's motion at Dkt. No. #37 is denied as moot. Plaintiff's motion at Dkt. No. #38 seeks to have the Court place Plaintiff's medical records under seal. Since no medical records have been filed to date, nor has any party sought to file Plaintiff's medical records, that motion is denied as premature. Plaintiff's motions at Dkt. Nos. #42 and #43 seek to dismiss Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. #10 ) as a "vexatious attempt to avoid prosecution" (Dkt. No. #42 ) and for sanctions (Dkt. No. #43 ), both of which pertain to Defendant's motion to dismiss at Dkt. No. #10 . Since Defendant's motion to dismiss has been withdrawn (see Dkt. Nos. #36 , 39 ), Plaintiff's motions at Dkt. Nos. #42 and #43 are also denied as moot. Plaintiff's motion at Dkt. No. #44 seeking to compel Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., serve as counsel for all parties is denied as frivolous since parties select their own counsel. Plaintiff's motion at Dkt. No. #45 seeking to compel discovery is denied as premature. Once all parties have been served with a summons and the operative amended complaint, and answers are filed by all parties who have been served, the Court will schedule a telephone conference to set a discovery schedule. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 11/26/2019. (A copy of this Text Order has been served on pro se party(ies) via regular mail.) (sg)
|
| Filing 47 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer M. Horowitz on behalf of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (Horowitz, Jennifer) |
| Filing 46 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin R Vozzo on behalf of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (Vozzo, Kevin) |
| TEXT NOTICE advising Plaintiff that, so far in this action, he has filed 13 motions that improperly lack an affidavit and memorandum of law, in violation of Local Rule 7.1(a)(1),(2). (Dkt. Nos. 23, 24, 25, 30, 31, 32, 33, 37, 38, 42, 43, 44, 45.) All of these motions were filed after Plaintiff was given notice of the requirement of an affidavit and memorandum of law. (See, e.g., Dkt. Nos. 22, 28.) Plaintiff is cautioned that, if he continues to file such abusive and/or vexatious motions in this action, he will be ordered to show cause why he should not be barred from proceeding without counsel in this action. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular mail)(kee) |
| Filing 45 MOTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV P. 37 MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY dated 11/13/19 filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson, Pro Se. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. {Clerk notes Pro Se lists Judge Brenda K. Sannes and Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. Judge Sannes and Magistrate Judge Baxter are not assigned to this case}. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kmp) |
| Filing 44 MOTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV P. 25 SUBSTITUTION OF PARTIES dated 11/13/19 filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson, Pro Se. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. {Clerk notes Pro Se lists Judge Brenda K. Sannes and Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. Judge Sannes and Magistrate Judge Baxter are not assigned to this case}. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kmp) |
| Filing 43 MOTION TO REVIEW DEFENDANT MOTIONS AND APPLY SANCTIONS FOR VEXATIOUS FILING OF MOTIONS LOCAL RULE 7.1 dated 11/13/19 by Jeffrey S. Jackson, Pro Se. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. {Clerk notes Pro Se lists Judge Brenda K. Sannes and Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. Judge Sannes and Magistrate Judge Baxter are not assigned to this case}. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kmp) |
| Filing 42 MOTION TO REVIEW DEFENDANT MOTIONS AND APPLY SANCTIONS FOR VEXATIOUS FILING OF MOTIONS LOCAL RULE 7.1 dated 11/13/19 filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson, Pro Se. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. {Clerk notes Pro Se lists Judge Brenda K. Sannes and Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. Judge Sannes and Magistrate Judge Baxter are not assigned to this case}. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kmp) |
|
Filing 41
TEXT ORDER denying without prejudice #40 Plaintiff's motion to "update the record." Plaintiff is respectfully reminded that, on November 8, 2019, he was (1) directed by the undersigned to provide the Clerk with summonses for each of the named defendants, as listed in the #27 Amended Complaint, on or before November 15, 2019, and (2) advised that, once summonses are issued by the Clerk, then they will be provided to the Plaintiff who is responsible for service upon each of the named Defendants (and then filing affidavits of service with the Court indicating service of process has been completed on each of the named defendants in accordance with the local rules of this district Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Dkt. No. 29 .) Plaintiff has failed to follow that procedure. Out of special solicitude to Plaintiff as a pro se litigant, the Court sua sponte extends the deadline of November 15, 2019, to the end of November 29, 2019. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 11/20/2019. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular mail)(sal )
|
| Filing 40 Letter Request enclosing Affidavit of Service from Jeffrey S. Jackson, Pro Se submitted to Judge Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. {Relief to be determined by Court}. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pjh) |
|
Filing 39
TEXT ORDER recognizing Defendant BNA's withdrawal of its motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. #10 ), and granting #36 Defendant BNA's request for an extension of time in which to file a second motion to dismiss. Although Defendant BNA anticipates that it will file its motion on or before November 20, 2019, it shall have until November 30, 2019, by which to do so. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 11/18/2019. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular mail). (sal )
|
| Filing 38 Letter Motion from Jeffrey S. Jackson requesting the Court place his medical records under seal submitted to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. (pjh) |
| Filing 37 MOTION to refute the testimony provided by Demedre R. Huelett as frivilous and vexatious filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson. Motions referred to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. {Clerk notes that the Notice of Motion sets a return date before Judge Brenda K. Sannes. Judge Sannes is not assigned to this case}.(pjh) |
| Filing 36 Letter Motion from David W. Garland for The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. requesting to file its anticipated motion on or before November 20, 2019 submitted to Judge Glenn T. Suddaby . (Garland, David) |
|
Filing 35
TEXT ORDER: Court reviewed Dkt. No. #33 which purports to be a motion to amend the amended complaint. Dkt. No. #33 is denied. The proposed attached complaint (Dkt. No. #33 -1) appears to be incomplete, and does not allege any causes of action. The amended complaint at Dkt. No. #27 remains the operative complaint. (Dkt. No. 29 .) SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 11/12/2019. (A copy of this Text Order has been served on pro se party(ies) via regular mail.) (sg)
|
|
Filing 34
TEXT ORDER: Court has reviewed plaintiff's motions at Dkt. Nos. #30 , #31 , and #32 , which appear to seek the same or similar relief. Court notes that once a party is properly served with the summons and complaint, and such party has then appeared in the action by counsel, all papers may be served on the attorney of record for that party. COURT NOTES THAT INITIAL SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND AMENDED COMPLAINT MUST BE SERVED ON EACH OF THE NAMED DEFENDANTS unless the party has already appeared by counsel. (See Dkt. No. 29 .) The initial Rule 16 conference previously scheduled for 11/27/2019 and related deadlines for mandatory disclosures and submission of a civil case management plan are all adjourned at this time and will be rescheduled after all parties have been served with the summons and operative amended complaint (see Dkt. No. #27 and 29 ) and have then appeared in the action. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 11/12/2019. (A copy of this Text Order has been served on pro se party(ies) via regular mail.) (sg )
|
|
Filing 29
TEXT ORDER : The Amended Complaint filed on 11/6/2019 (Dkt. No. #27 ) has been deemed the operative pleading in this matter. Plaintiff is directed to provide the Clerk with summonses for each of the named defendants, as listed in the #27 Amended Complaint, on or before 11/15/2019. Once summonses are issued by the Clerk, then they will be provided to the Plaintiff who is responsible for service upon each of the named defendants. Plaintiff shall thereafter file affidavits of service with the Court indicating service of process has been completed on each of the named defendants in accordance with the local rules of this district Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 11/8/2019. (Copy served upon Plaintiff via regular mail)(sal )
|
| Filing 33 MOTION to Amend the #27 Amended Complaint filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint) Motions referred to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. {Clerk notes that the Proposed Amended Complaint references the wrong case number. Clerk also notes that the Notice of Motion sets a return date before Judge Brenda K. Sannes. Judge Sannes is not assigned to this case}.(pjh) |
| Filing 32 MOTION for Rule 5(b)1 serving an attorney of record filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson. Motions referred to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. {Clerk notes that the Notice of Motion sets a return date before Judge Brenda K. Sannes. Judge Sannes is not assigned to this case}.(pjh) |
| Filing 31 MOTION for Rule 5(c)1C filing any such pleading and serving it on the Plaintiff constitues good notice of the pleading filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson. Motions referred to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. {Clerk notes that the Notice of Motion references an exhibit, however no exhibit was included. Clerk also notes that the Notice of Motion sets a return date before Judge Brenda K. Sannes. Judge Sannes is not assigned to this case}.(pjh) |
| Filing 30 MOTION to serve papers on the attorney pursuant to Rule 5 (c)1B filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson. Motions referred to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. (pjh){Clerk notes that the Notice of Motion references an exhibit, however no exhibit was included. Clerk also notes that the Notice of Motion sets a return date before Judge Brenda K. Sannes. Judge Sannes is not assigned to this case}. Modified on 11/8/2019 to clarify entry (pjh). |
|
Filing 28
TEXT ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. No. #23 ), his motion for sanctions (Dkt. No. #24 ), and his motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. #25 ), because they are unsupported by a memorandum of law and affidavit, as required by Local Rule 7.1(a)(1),(2). His second motion is denied without prejudice for the alternative reason that it fails to specify the rule or statute on which it is based, as required by Local Rule 7.1(a)(1). His third motion is denied without prejudice for the alternative reason that it is fails to attach a Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, as required by Local Rule 7.1(a)(3). The parties are advised that, because Plaintiff had a right to file his Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. #27 ) as of right under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B), his #27 Amended Complaint is now the operative pleading in this action and supersedes in all respect his original Complaint (Dkt. No. #2 ). Defendants are respectfully directed to advise the Court in writing, within SEVEN (7) DAYS from the date of this Text Order, of the following two things: (1) what portions of their motion to dismiss (if any) remain pending following the filing of the Amended Complaint; and (2) the extent to which they withdraw their motion as moot, leave the motion undisturbed, and/or request supplemental briefing on that motion. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 11/7/2019. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular mail). (sal )
|
| Filing 27 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bloomberg L.P. and STF Services Corp. filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Amended Civil Cover Sheet)(pjh) |
| Filing 26 CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Jeffrey S. Jackson, Pro Se. (pjh) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to Compel Summary Judgment on Human Rights Law filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson, Pro Se. Motions referred to Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby. (pjh) |
| Filing 24 CROSS MOTION for Review and Sanctions for Vexatious or Frivilous Motions and Order to Comply filed by Jeffrey S. Jackson, Pro Se. Motions referred to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. (pjh) |
| Filing 23 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Jeffrey S. Jackson.(pjh) |
| Filing 22 PRO SE NOTICE signed by Jeffrey S. Jackson, Pro Se. (pjh) |
|
Filing 21
TEXT ORDER: Court reviewed docket and directs Plaintiff to file a status report regarding service of process on defendant STF Services Corp. and defendant Bloomberg L.P. by 11/15/19. If Plaintiff served these defendants with the state court complaint, Index No. SU-2019-009089, Plaintiff shall file the appropriate affidavit(s) of service by 11/15/19. If service was not completed on these defendants, Plaintiff shall take necessary steps to serve these defendants with the summons and complaint and update the Court on service in the 11/15/2019 status report. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 11/5/2019. (A copy of this Text Order has been served on pro se party(ies) via regular mail.)(sg )
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by David Garland on behalf of Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group (Garland, David) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin R Vozzo on behalf of Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group (Vozzo, Kevin) |
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group re #14 Memorandum of Law, #15 Affidavit in Support of Motion, #13 Notice (Other), #16 Notice (Other), #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim And to Enjoin Plaintiff From Bringing Further Duplicative Actions (Freeman, Scarlett) |
| CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY: Exhibits A, B, C, F, and G to docket numbers #11 and #15 have been replaced with redacted exhibits to protect personal identifiers. Upon review of the docket, docket numbers #15 and #16 are duplicative of docket numbers #11 and #12 . (pjh) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF of response deadline of 11/18/2019 for #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim And to Enjoin Plaintiff From Bringing Further Duplicative Actions. (Served plaintiff by regular mail). (sal) |
| TEXT NOTICE regarding Motion #10 to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim And to Enjoin Plaintiff From Bringing Further Duplicative Actions: Response to Motion remains due by 11/18/2019. Any reply to this motion is due by 11/25/2019. This motion is taken on submission of the papers and returnable before Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 12/5/2019. NO APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED. (Served plaintiff by regular mail). (sal) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE by Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim And to Enjoin Plaintiff From Bringing Further Duplicative Actions (Defendant's Request For Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A)(Freeman, Scarlett) |
| Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim And to Enjoin Plaintiff From Bringing Further Duplicative Actions (Declaration of Demedre R. Heulett) filed by Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G, #8 Exhibit(s) H, #9 Exhibit(s) I)(Freeman, Scarlett) (Attachments 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7 replaced on 11/5/2019 with redacted copies) (pjh) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OF LAW re #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, (Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss) filed by Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group. (Freeman, Scarlett) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE by Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim And to Enjoin Plaintiff From Bringing Further Duplicative Actions (Notice to Pro Se Plaintiff of The Consequences of Failing to Respond to a Dispositive Motion) (Freeman, Scarlett) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim And to Enjoin Plaintiff From Bringing Further Duplicative Actions (Defendant's Request For Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A)(Freeman, Scarlett) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim And to Enjoin Plaintiff From Bringing Further Duplicative Actions (Declaration of Demedre R. Heulett) filed by Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G, #8 Exhibit(s) H, #9 Exhibit(s) I)(Freeman, Scarlett) (Attachments 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7 replaced on 11/5/2019 with redacted copies) (pjh) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim And to Enjoin Plaintiff From Bringing Further Duplicative Actions Motion Hearing set for 12/5/2019 10:00 AM in Syracuse before Judge Brenda K. Sannes Response to Motion due by 11/18/2019 Reply to Response to Motion due by 11/25/2019. filed by Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group. (Freeman, Scarlett) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. upon review of this case, it was determined that this case is directly related to case #5:19-cv-1281. In the interest of judicial economy, this case is reassigned to Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby and Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks for all further proceedings. Judge Brenda K. Sannes and US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter no longer assigned to case. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 10/31/19. (lmw) (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail)
|
| ***Answer due date updated for Bloomberg BNA answer due 11/1/2019; Bloomberg Industry Group answer due 11/1/2019. (see) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Defendants Corporate Disclosure Statement served on Jeffrey S. Jackson on 10/29/2019, filed by Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group. (Freeman, Scarlett) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for General Order #25 (Filing Order), Case Management Plan, Case Assignment/Motion Schedules and Filing Locations, and a Consent Form to Proceed before U.S. Magistrate Judge served on Jeffrey S. Jackson on 10/29/2019, filed by Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group. (Freeman, Scarlett) |
| Filing 6 FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group identifying Other Affiliate Bloomberg-BNA Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate Bloomberg Inc. for Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group.. (Freeman, Scarlett) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Defendant's Notice of Removal and Civil Cover Sheet served on Jeffrey S. Jackson on 10/25/2019, filed by Bloomberg BNA, Bloomberg Industry Group. (Freeman, Scarlett) |
| Clerk mailed a copy of the Dkt. No. #3 G.O. 25 Filing Order to pro se plaintiff at P.O. Box 3174, Liverpool, NY 13090 via regular mail on 10/29/2019. (hmr) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE: Clerk mailed a copy of the Notice and Pro Se Handbook to Pro Se Plaintiff on 10/28/2019 and the Plaintiff was directed to read the notice and return a signed copy back to the Court. (pjh) |
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Telephone Conference set for 11/27/2019 10:00 AM before US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 11/20/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (pjh) |
| Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT filed in Onondaga County Court by Jeffrey S. Jackson, State Court Case Number SU-2019-009089 filed by Bloomberg BNA and Bloomberg Industry Group. (pjh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Onondaga County Court, case number SU-2019-009089 (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4920893) filed by Bloomberg BNA and Bloomberg Industry Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint)(pjh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2019: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (pjh). Modified on 10/29/2019 to include Civil Cover Sheet (pjh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
