Riley v. Taylor et al
Plaintiff: Tony D. Riley
Defendant: Staci Dennis Taylor and Onondaga County Sex Offender Office
Case Number: 5:2019cv01451
Filed: November 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Andrew T Baxter
Referring Judge: Brenda K Sannes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 26, 2019 Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #4 Text Order and #6 Order and Report- Recommendation sent to Tony Riley. Address sent to 753 James Street, Apt. 526, Syracuse, NY 13203. Envelope reads "Return to Sender/Attempted - Not Known/Unable to Forward." (kmp)
December 23, 2019 Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #6 Order and Report- Recommendation sent to Tony Riley. Address sent to Onondaga County Justice Center. Envelope reads "Not Here/Return to Sender." (kmp)
December 16, 2019 Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable; re: Dkt. No. 4 Text Order. Sent to Riley Address sent to Onondaga County Justice Center. Envelope reads "released". (nas, )
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER AND REPORT-RECOMMENDATION: That plaintiff's #3 request to proceed IFP is GRANTED for purposes of filing only, and it is RECOMMENDED, that the #5 amended complaint be DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE as against the ONONDAGA COUNTY SEX OFFENDER OFFICE, based upon 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim, and it is RECOMMENDED, that the #5 amended complaint be DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHOUT PREJUDICE as against DEFENDANT ROBERT EARL, ESQ., based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and it isRECOMMENDED, that the #5 amended complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE against defendant DENNIS to the extent that defendant Dennis was acting in her prosecutorial capacity based upon absolute immunity under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (B)(iii), and it is RECOMMENDED, that the remainder of the complaint be DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHOUT PREJUDICE, based upon 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim, but without opportunity to amend at this time (Objections to R&R due by 12/30/2019, Case Review Deadline 1/3/2020). Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 12/13/2019. {Copy served upon Pro Se plaintiff via regular mail}. (kmp)
December 10, 2019 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Onondaga County Sex Offender Office and Staci Dennis Taylor filed by Tony D. Riley, Pro Se. {With envelope attached}. (kmp)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 12/4/19. (Copy served upon Pro Se Plaintiff via regular mail)(kmp)
December 4, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Tony D. Riley, Pro Se. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter. (kmp)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement. It is ORDERED that, because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action; and it is further ORDERED that, if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, either (1) pay the $400.00 filing fee in full; or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP application; and it is further ORDERED that, in the event plaintiff chooses to file an IFP application, it must be accompanied by a signed inmate authorization form in accordance with the Court's Local Rules; and it is further ORDERED that, upon plaintiff's compliance herewith, the Clerk shall reopen thisaction and forward it to the Court for review; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on plaintiff along with a blank IFP application and blank inmate authorization form. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on November 22, 2019. (Copy served via regular mail along with a blank IFP Application and Inmate Authorization form as directed).(rep)
November 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Onondaga County Sex Offender Office, Staci Dennis Taylor filed by Tony D. Riley. (Mailing envelope included)(meb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riley v. Taylor et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Staci Dennis Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Onondaga County Sex Offender Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tony D. Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?