Relyea v. United Parcel Services, Inc.
Levi Relyea |
United Parcel Services, Inc. |
5:2019cv01491 |
December 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
Brenda K Sannes |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE by Levi Relyea of Consent to Opt-in & Become Party-Plaintiff Under 29. U.S.C. 216(b) (Matusz, Stanley) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER approving #7 Stipulation and granting extension for defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to complaint. Answer for United Parcel Services, Inc. due 2/5/2020. The telephone Rule 16 Conference remains set for 3/2/2020. Counsel are reminded that requests for extensions of deadlines must be made before the relevant deadline passes, and must show good cause for the extension even if the parties stipulate to it. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 1/8/2020. (sg) |
Filing 8 FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United Parcel Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent United Parcel Service, Inc. for United Parcel Services, Inc... (Feher, Kristine) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint Stipulation and proposed order extending time to answer, move or otherwise respond by United Parcel Services, Inc. submitted to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks, U.S.M.J.. (Feher, Kristine) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Micala C. Robinson on behalf of United Parcel Services, Inc. (Robinson, Micala) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristine J. Feher on behalf of United Parcel Services, Inc. (Feher, Kristine) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Wendy J. Lario on behalf of United Parcel Services, Inc. (Lario, Wendy) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Telephone Rule 16 Conference set for 3/2/2020 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 2/24/2020. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (kmp) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to United Parcel Services, Inc. (kmp) |
Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against United Parcel Services, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4960003) filed by Levi Relyea. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (kmp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Relyea v. United Parcel Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Levi Relyea | |
Represented By: | Stanley J. Matusz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United Parcel Services, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Wendy J. Lario |
Represented By: | Micala C. Robinson |
Represented By: | Kristine J. Feher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.