DeLee v. State of New York et al
| Dwight R. DeLee |
| State of New York, Publishers of NY CLS Desk Edition Gilbert's, Syracuse Police Department, Post Standard and Syracuse.com |
| 5:2020cv00549 |
| May 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Andrew T Baxter |
| Miroslav Lovric |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER: denying #5 Letter Motion without prejudice to renew. Plaintiff has moved to extend his time to file an amended complaint in accordance with this court's "order." However, this court issued an Order and Report-Recommendation. Plaintiff's request for an extension to file an amended complaint is premature, and he should wait until the District Judge acts on my Order and Report-Recommendation [Dkt. No. 4]. If the court adopts my Order and Report-Recommendation, and plaintiff still wishes to file an amended complaint, and needs more time to do so, he may reapply for an extension of time. So Ordered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 6/30/2020. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail.](nmk)
|
|
Filing 5
Letter Motion for Dwight R. DeLee requesting a 30 day extension of time to file an amended complaint submitted to Judge Baxter. (mgh)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER and REPORT RECOMMENDATION: ORDERED, that plaintiff's #2 application to proceed IFP be GRANTED for purposes of filing and initial review, and it is RECOMMENDED, that the complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BUT WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as to DEFENDANTS STATE OF NEW YORK, "SYRACUSE POLICE DEPARTMENT," POST STANDARD/SYRACUSE.COM, and GILBERT'S; and it is RECOMMENDED, that if the District Court adopts this Order and Report- Recommendation, to the extent that the complaint may be interpreted as naming the CITY OF SYRACUSE as a defendant, the complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BUT WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO AMEND. and it is RECOMMENDED, that if the court adopts this Order and Report Recommendation, and plaintiff does submit a proposed amended complaint, such complaint be returned to me for further review.Objections to R&R due by 6/26/2020, Case Review Deadline 6/29/2020), ORDER. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 6/12/2020. (Copy served via regular mail)(mgh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric no longer assigned to case. The case remains assigned to the Honorable Glenn T. Suddaby, Chief U.S. District Judge. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 5/29/2020. (Copy served via regular mail)(mgh)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Dwight R. DeLee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to NY CLS Desk Edition- Glibert's, #2 Proposed Summons as to Post Standard, #3 Proposed Summons as to Attorney General, #4 Proposed Summons as to Syracuse.com, #5 Proposed Summons as to Syracuse Police Department) Motions referred to Miroslav Lovric. (mgh) (Main Document 2 replaced on 5/20/2020 to redact personal Identification information) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Post Standard, Publishers of NY CLS Desk Edition Gilbert's, State of New York, Syracuse Police Department, Syracuse.com filed by Dwight R. DeLee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mgh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
