Snogles v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Maureen Snogles |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 5:2020cv01158 |
| September 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Christian F Hummel |
| Thomas J McAvoy |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE to Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy and Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel for all further proceedings. Parties have not consented. Authorized by the Chief Judge pursuant to General Order #18. (drm)
|
|
Filing 5
SOCIAL SECURITY CONSENT / DECLINATION FORM filed by Maureen Snogles advising of declination of consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (Olinsky, Howard)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Timothy Sean Bolen appearing for Commissioner of Social Security . Social Security Administrative Transcript due by 12/28/2020. (Bolen, Timothy)
|
|
Filing 3
Social Security Appeal Case Assignment Form and General Order #18 Issued. Pursuant to General Order #18, in the event the Plaintiff does not timely consent, or if the United States timely withdraws its consent, the case will be reassigned to a District Judge consistent with General Order #12. Social Security Consent/Declination Form due by 10/14/2020. (khr)
|
|
Filing 2
Social Security Identification Form [LODGED] [Pursuant to General Order #18, this document has been electronically lodged with the Court and will be removed from the docket upon the filing of the Administrative Transcript. Viewable by case participants and court personnel only, it is not a filed document, therefore is not available for public inspection. Any further distribution or dissemination is prohibited]. (khr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT - Social Security Appeal. [Pursuant to General Order #18, Section B(3), the CM/ECF system will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing to the USAO-NDNY and Regional Counsel for the Social Security Administration. Service of a Complaint along with the Social Security Identification Form under the Pilot Program will be considered complete only when the three steps in paragraph 3(A), 3(B) and 3(C) of General Order #18 have been completed.] (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-5253329). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(khr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Snogles v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Sean Bolen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maureen Snogles | |
| Represented By: | Howard D. Olinsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
