McDonald v. Molina et al
Gerald McDonald |
State of Connecticut, Stamford Police Department, Jeannie Calcano Peare, Adriana Molina, Court Support Services Division, Gladys Calcano, Seth Peare and Jane Doe(s) |
5:2020cv01341 |
October 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
Gary L Sharpe |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC SERVICE filed by Gerald McDonald, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Envelope)(kmc) |
Filing 4 PRO SE HANDBOOK, NOTICE, and LOCAL RULES issued and sent to Pro Se plaintiff via regular mail.(kmc) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Telephone Rule 16 Conference set for 1/27/2021 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 1/20/2021. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) [Clerk mailed GO 25 via regular mail to pro se plaintiff](kmc) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Adriana Molina (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued for Stamford Police Department, #2 Summons Issued for Court Support Services Division, #3 Summons Issued for State of Connecticut, #4 Summons Issued for Jeannie Calcano Peare, #5 Summons Issued for Seth Peare, #6 Summons Issued for Gladys Calcano) [Clerk mailed summonses via regular mail to pro se plaintiff](kmc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Adriana Molina, Stamford Police Department, Court Support Services Division, State of Connecticut, Jeannie Calcano Peare, Seth Peare, Gladys Calcano, and Jane Doe(s). (Filing fee $400 receipt number SYR058321) filed by Gerald McDonald, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(kmc) |
TEXT NOTICE: Although the plaintiff herein has named Jane Doe(s) in the Complaint, the Clerk's Office will not issue a summons for service of process on "Jane Doe(s)" defendants at this time. In the event plaintiff wishes to pursue the claims against these defendants, plaintiff shall take reasonable steps to ascertain the defendants identity. When plaintiff determines the identity of "Jane Doe(s)" defendants, plaintiff may seek to amend the pleading to add the properly named defendant pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 15 and summons will be issued at that time. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail](kmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.