Rogalski v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Joyce Rogalski and Joyce Rogaisili
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Comenity Bank
Case Number: 5:2021cv00836
Filed: July 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Referring Judge: Lawrence E Kahn
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2021 ***Answer due date updated for Comenity Bank answer due 9/28/2021. (jel, )
August 11, 2021 CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY re #4 Waiver of Service Returned Executed - Corrected text to reflect as waiver of service returned executed as to defendant Comenity Bank on 7/30/2021. (jel, )
August 5, 2021 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed Comenity Bank waiver sent on 7/30/2021, answer due 9/28/2021.(Zemel, Daniel) Modified on 8/11/2021 (jel, ).
July 23, 2021 Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 10/27/2021 at 10:15 AM in Syracuse before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. All conferences are conducted by telephone. Plaintiff's attorney will initiate the call (unless the court directs differently) and shall contact Judge Dancks' Chambers at 315-234-8618 (a dedicated line solely for telephone conferences) one all parties are on the line. Counsel may use a teleconference service for assistance initiating conference calls to the court. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 10/20/2021. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (jel, )
July 23, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Comenity Bank, Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons issued to Comenity, LLC)(jel, )
July 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Comenity Bank, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-5594455) filed by Joyce Rogalski. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jel, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogalski v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joyce Rogalski
Represented By: Daniel Zemel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joyce Rogaisili
Represented By: Daniel Zemel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comenity Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?