Marquardt Switches, Inc. et al v. Phillips-Medisize, LLC
Plaintiff: Marquardt Switches, Inc. and Marquardt Mexico S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
Defendant: Phillips-Medisize, LLC
Case Number: 5:2021cv00972
Filed: August 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Referring Judge: Frederick J Scullin
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2021 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Marquardt Switches, Inc., Marquardt Mexico S. DE R.L. DE C.V.. Phillips-Medisize, LLC waiver sent on 9/7/2021, answer due 11/8/2021. (Aliasso, Anneliese)
August 31, 2021 Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Conference by Telephone set for 12/1/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 11/24/2021. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (map)
August 31, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Phillips-Medisize, LLC. (map)
August 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Phillips-Medisize, LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number BNYNDC-5632088) filed by Marquardt Switches, Inc., Marquardt Mexico S. DE R.L. DE C.V.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A: Price Agreement 2020 Phillips Plastics Corps, #3 Exhibit B: Scheduling Agreement - 5500174844-M12 / 12/11/2018, #4 Exhibit C: Scheduling Agreement - 5500174848-M12 / 12/11/2018, #5 Exhibit D: Scheduling Agreement - 5500174208-U34 / 01/23/2019, #6 Exhibit E: 5500188655-M12 / 03/25/2021, #7 Exhibit F: 5500163856-U14 / 03/25/2021, #8 Exhibit G: March 18, 2021 - Phillips Medisize Letter Correspondence, #9 Exhibit H: March 26, 2021 - Hancock Estabrook Letter Correspondence, #10 Exhibit I: April 8, 2021 - Phillips Medisize Letter Correspondence, #11 Exhibit J: April 12, 2021 - Hancock Estabrook, LLP Letter Response, #12 Exhibit K: April 15, 2021 - Phillips Medisize Letter Response, #13 Exhibit L: Scheduling Agreement - 5500163856-U14 / 08/04/2021, #14 Exhibit M: Tracker Chart, #15 Exhibit N: November 18, 2020 - Marquardt Letter Correspondence)(map)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marquardt Switches, Inc. et al v. Phillips-Medisize, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marquardt Switches, Inc.
Represented By: Anneliese Aliasso
Represented By: James J. O'Shea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marquardt Mexico S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
Represented By: Anneliese Aliasso
Represented By: James J. O'Shea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillips-Medisize, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?