Lavine v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| Stephen M. Lavine |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 5:2021cv01005 |
| September 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| David N Hurd |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Carl G. Eurenius on behalf of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Eurenius, Carl) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & Complaint and Notice and Filing Order served on USA c/o US Atty, NDNY on 09/16/2021, filed by Stephen M. Lavine. (Riggi, Samantha) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & Complaint and Notice and Filing Order served on VA Syracuse on 09/17/2021, filed by Stephen M. Lavine. (Riggi, Samantha) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & Complaint and Notice and Filing Order on 09/14/2021, filed by Stephen M. Lavine. (Riggi, Samantha) |
| ***Answer due date updated for UNITED STATES OF AMERICA answer due 11/15/2021. (khr) |
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 12/14/2021 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. All conferences are conducted by telephone. Plaintiff's attorney will initiate the call (unless the Court directs differently) and shall contact Judge Dancks' Chambers at 315-234-8618 (a dedicated line solely for telephone conferences) once all parties are on the line. Counsel may use a teleconferencing service for assistance initiating conference calls to the Court. For cases involving pro se parties, the Court will initiate the call for the Rule 16 Conference. Pro se parties are instructed to provide the Court with a telephone number where they may be reached for a conference call. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/7/2021. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (khr) Modified on 9/13/2021 (sg, ). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (United States Attorney). (Attachments: #1 Summons issued to US Attorney General, #2 Summons issued to Syracuse VA Medical Center)(khr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-5644289) filed by Stephen M. Lavine. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(khr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lavine v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stephen M. Lavine | |
| Represented By: | Samantha C. Riggi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Carl G. Eurenius |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
