Johnson v. Hampton Inn & Suites Syracuse /Carrier Circle et al
Robert W. Johnson |
Hampton Inn & Suites Syracuse /Carrier Circle, Marcus Rabit, Jefferson County Dept. of Social Services, Teresa Gaffney, Deborah Labidini, The Workplace, Tracy Eveleigh, M. Burns, Kathy Hochul, Robert J. Rodriguez and Georgeann Stevenson |
5:2022cv00419 |
May 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Miroslav Lovric |
Gary L Sharpe |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court consolidate Johnson I (No. 22- CV-0396), Johnson II (No. 5:22-CV-0403), Johnson III (No. 5:22-CV-0404), Johnson IV (No. 5:22-CV- 0405), Johnson V (No. 5:22-CV-0406), Johnson VI (No. 5:22-CV-0407), Johnson VII (No. 5:22- CV-0408), Johnson VIII (No. 5:22-CV-0409), Johnson IX (No. 5:22-CV-0410), Johnson X (No. 5:22-CV-0411), Johnson XI (No. 5:22-CV-0412), Johnson XII (No. 5:22-CV-0413), Johnson XIII (No. 5:22-CV-0414), Johnson XIV (No. 5:22-CV-0415), Johnson XV (No. 5:22- CV-0416), Johnson XVI (No. 5:22-CV-0417), Johnson XVII (No. 5:22-CV-0418), Johnson XVIII (No. 5:22- CV-0419), Johnson XIX (No. 5:22-CV-0420), and Johnson XX (No. 5:22-CV-0421). Johnson I shall be referred to and treated as the Lead Case, and all subsequent Orders of the Court and papers that are submitted by the parties hereto that pertain to any of the foregoing actions shall be filed in Johnson I; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court place a copy of this Order in the file of Johnson II, Johnson III, Johnson IV, Johnson V, Johnson VI, Johnson VII, Johnson VIII, Johnson IX Johnson X, Johnson XI, Johnson XII, Johnson XIII, Johnson XIV, Johnson XV, Johnson XVI, Johnson XVII, Johnson XVIII, Johnson XIX, and Johnson XX; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis in Johnson I is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's applications to proceed in forma pauperis in Johnson II, Johnson III, Johnson IV, Johnson V, Johnson VI, Johnson VII, Johnson VIII, Johnson IX, Johnson X, Johnson XI, Johnson XII, Johnson XIII, Johnson XIV, Johnson XV, Johnson XVI, Johnson XVII, Johnson XVIII, Johnson XIX, and Johnson XX are DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on 6/1/2022. (Copy served via regular mail)(mgh) |
Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting [] Direct Assignment. The cases are deemed related. Issued by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 5/5/2022. (Copy served via regular mail)(jel, ) |
TEXT Notice pursuant to General Order 12 of Potential Related Case(s), submitted to District Judge for review and determination. Potential Related cases: 5:22-CV-389. (see) |
Filing 4 Letter from Robert Johnson re: contact information. (mgh) |
Filing 3 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE issued and explained at time complaint was filed. (mgh) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert W. Johnson Motions referred to Miroslav Lovric. (mgh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against M. Burns, Tracy Eveleigh, Teresa Gaffney, Hampton Inn & Suites Syracuse /Carrier Circle, Kathy Hochul, Jefferson County Dept. of Social Services, Deborah Labidini, Marcus Rabit, Robert J. Rodriguez, Georgeann Stevenson, The Workplace filed by Robert W. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Service by Mail)(mgh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.