Johnson v. Vera House, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Robert W. Johnson
Defendant: Vera House, Inc. and Marcus of Vera House, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2022cv00467
Filed: April 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Mae A D'Agostino
Referring Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2022 Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. re: #4 Report and Recommendations, sent to Robert W. Johnson Address sent to 112 Court Street, Apt. 2, Watertown, NY 13601 (khr)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert W. Johnson filed by Robert W. Johnson. ORDERED that Plaintiffs motions to proceed in forma pauperis are granted forpurposes of initial review only; and it is further RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs complaints in the five (5) above-captioned actions be DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii). Objections to R&R due by 5/24/2022 Case Review Deadline 5/27/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 5/10/2022. (Copy served via regular mail)(khr)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 TEXT ORDER: Court has reviewed docket and notes that this matter was erroneously opened as a miscellaneous case. Therefore, the Clerk is directed to correct the docket to assign the matter a civil case number. Plaintiff is advised that the corrected docket number must be used on all future filings referencing this case. Court also notes that this case was incorrectly opened as a "sealed" case and therefore the Clerk is directed to unseal it. Additionally, the Court notes the case is under initial review pursuant to 28 USC Section 1915(e) since plaintiff seeks in forma pauperis status. A report-recommendation will be issued in due course once the initial review is complete. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 5/5/2022. (A copy of this Text Order has been served on pro se party(ies) via regular mail.)(sg )(lmw, )
April 26, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert W. Johnson. Motions referred to Therese Wiley Dancks. (lmw, )
April 26, 2022 Filing 1 Appeal for Alleged Injunction by Robert W. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (lmw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Vera House, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert W. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vera House, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marcus of Vera House, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?