Johnson v. Executive East Syracuse Hotel LLC et al
| Robert W. Johnson |
| Executive East Syracuse Hotel LLC and Indeed |
| 5:2022cv00535 |
| May 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Andrew T Baxter |
| David N Hurd |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 AMENDED JUDGMENT: The Report & Recommendation is ACCEPTED ineach of the twenty-one above-captioned civil actions; The twenty-one above-captioned civil actions are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Appeal Notice) (khr)(Copy served via regular and certified mail) |
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT: The Report & Recommendation is ACCEPTED in each of the twenty-one above-captioned civil actions; The twenty-one above-captioned civil actions are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. (Copy served via regular and certified mail) (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Appeal Notice) (khr) |
Filing 8
ORDER ON REPORT & RECOMMENDATION adopting Report and Recommendations re #6 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that 1. The Report & Recommendation is ACCEPTED in each of the twenty-one above- captioned civil actions; 2. The twenty-one above-captioned civil actions are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 7/11/2022. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(khr)
|
| Filing 7 OBJECTION to #6 Report and Recommendations by Robert W. Johnson. (egr) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER and REPORT-RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Robert W. Johnson, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert W. Johnson filed by Robert W. Johnson, #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Robert W. Johnson. ORDERED, that plaintiffs motions to proceed IFP are GRANTED FORPURPOSES OF FILING ONLY, and it is RECOMMENDED, that the twenty-one (21) above-captioned actions be DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B), and it is ORDERED, that plaintiffs motions for appointment of counsel9 are DENIED AS MOOT. Objections to R&R due by 7/5/2022 Case Review Deadline 7/8/2022. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 6/21/2022. (Copy served via regular mail)(khr)
|
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee in this action, and his application to proceed in forma pauperis is currently under review by this court. Accordingly, there is no pending deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until plaintiff's IFP application has been addressed. So Ordered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 6/16/2022. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail](kmc) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE issued and explained to Robert W. Johnson at time complaint was filed on 5/19/2022. (khr)(Copy provided to pro se plaintiff. Po se plaintiff did not want a copy of the pro se handbook or local rules) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Robert W. Johnson. Motions referred to Andrew T. Baxter. (khr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert W. Johnson Motions referred to Andrew T. Baxter. (khr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Executive East Syracuse Hotel LLC, Indeed filed by Robert W. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Service)(khr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
