The Travelers Indemnity Company v. Main Street America Assurance Company
| The Travelers Indemnity Company |
| Main Street America Assurance Company |
| 5:2022cv00773 |
| July 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Brenda K Sannes |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Western District of New York: As the Court has been advised that this matter was filed in the incorrect district, it is ordered that this action is hereby transferred to the Western District of New York. SO ORDERED Signed by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 7/25/2022. (sg)
|
| Filing 4 FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by The Travelers Indemnity Company identifying Corporate Parent Travelers Property Casualty Corp., Corporate Parent Travelers Insurance Group Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent The Travelers Companies, Inc. for The Travelers Indemnity Company.. (Engeldrum, Joanne) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS(ES): The Travelers Indemnity Company is requesting summons(es) be issued as to Main Street America Assurance Company re: #1 Complaint. (Engeldrum, Joanne) |
| Case transferred from New York Northern has been opened in U.S. District Court, Western District of New York as case 1:22-cv-00578, filed 07/25/2022. (amt) |
| TEXT NOTICE OF FILING DEFICIENCY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of the following Filing Deficiency: Proposed Summons(es) were not included with the Complaint. Counsel is directed to file proposed summons(es) on the docket using the REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS(ES) event within 3 days of this notice. Notice of Filing Deficiency Deadline: 7/28/2022. (map) |
| Filing 2 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Conference by Telephone set for 10/19/2022 at 11:30 AM before U.S. Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 10/12/2022. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (map) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Main Street America Assurance Company (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-5976667) filed by The Travelers Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(map) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Travelers Indemnity Company v. Main Street America Assurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Travelers Indemnity Company | |
| Represented By: | Joanne M. Engeldrum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Main Street America Assurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
