Booth v. City of Watertown et al
| Patrick M. Booth |
| City of Watertown, Watertown Police Department, Dustin C. Shawcross, Pearce A. Parsons, David Paulsen and Charles Donoghue |
| 5:2022cv01011 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Miroslav Lovric |
| Brenda K Sannes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Letter from Patrick M. Booth requesting information if the court needs anything further and if the court will assign counsel. (ztc)
|
|
Filing 6
Letter Request to place a lien on defendants and notifying the court of his address upon release on or about 12/29/2022 filed by Patrick M. Booth. (meb)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Patrick M. Booth.(meb)
|
|
Filing 4
INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM filed by Patrick M. Booth. (meb)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Patrick M. Booth.(meb)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Patrick M. Booth. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(meb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEAMND against City of Watertown, Charles Donoghue, Pearce A. Parsons, David Paulsen, Dustin C. Shawcross, Watertown Police Department filed by Patrick M. Booth. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover letter and mailing envelope)(meb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
