United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry, VL: $63,202.00
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Assorted Jewelry, VL: $63,202.00
Claimant: Ivan Rodriguez
Case Number: 5:2023cv01456
Filed: November 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Andrew T Baxter
Referring Judge: David N Hurd
2 Judge: Mitchell J Katz
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to US Magistrate Judge Mitchell J. Katz for all further proceedings. Recalled Magistrate Andrew T Baxter no longer assigned to case. Authorized by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 1/5/24. (lmw)
December 28, 2023 Filing 8 CLAIM filed. by Ivan Rodriguez. (McKeon, Courtenay)
December 28, 2023 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Ivan Rodriguez.(McKeon, Courtenay)
December 22, 2023 Filing 6 SERVICE by Publication of Notice of Forfeiture; Last publication date December 21, 2023 in the government's internet website: www.forfeiture.gov; last day to file a claim is January 21, 2024. filed by United States of America (Conger, Elizabeth)
December 8, 2023 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America of a copy of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem, the Warrant for Arrest of Articles in Rem and the Notice to Potential Claimant via United States Postal Service, certified and regular mail to Paola Santiago, and Courtenay McKeon, Esq., attorney for Ivan J. Rodriguez, Sr. (Conger, Elizabeth)
December 6, 2023 Filing 4 WARRANT for Arrest of Articles In REM Returned Executed as to US Marshals on 12/4/2023. (mmg).
December 6, 2023 Filing 3 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN of United States Marshals Service Returned Executed as to US Marshals on 12/4/2023 Arrest of Property (Cats# 22-DEA-684923). In US Marshals Custody since 12/2/2021. (mmg).
November 20, 2023 Filing 2 WARRANT of Arrest in Rem issued filed by United States of America. (No hearing date). (mmg).
November 20, 2023 Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against Assorted Jewelry, VL: $63,202.00 filed by United States of America. (Fee Waived) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mmg) (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/1/2023) (ptm, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Assorted Jewelry, VL: $63,202.00
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Conger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Assorted Jewelry, VL: $63,202.00
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Ivan Rodriguez
Represented By: Courtenay K. McKeon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?