Miller v. Catholic Charities et al
| Khalid Miller |
| Catholic Charities, Jane Doe and John Doe |
| 5:2024cv00040 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
AMENDED COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Catholic Charities, John Doe and Jane Doe, filed by Khalid Miller. (kck)
|
|
Filing 8
Letter from Khalid Miller, Pro Se, requesting copy of Pro Se Handbook. (Clerk sent copy of docket sheet, Pro Se handbook, Local Rules and Pro Se forms packet via regular mail). (kck)
|
|
Filing 7
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION and ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. #4 ) is GRANTED, and it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's claims be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Objections to Report-Recommendation due by 3/5/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 2/20/2024. (Copy served via regular mail) (kck)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Signed by U.S. District Judge Glenn T Suddaby on January 26, 2024. {text order served via regular mail on plaintiff} (kck)
|
|
Filing 5
INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Khalid Miller. (kck)
|
|
Filing 4
SECOND MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Khalid Miller, Pro Se. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons as to All Defendants) Motions referred to Therese Wiley Dancks. (kck)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement. Plaintiff's IFP application is DENIED as incomplete. Because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. If plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, (1) either (a) pay the $405.00 filing fee in full, or (b) submit a completed and signed IFP application; AND (2) submit a completed and signed inmate authorization form. Upon plaintiff's compliance with this Order, the Clerk shall reopen the action and forward it to the Court for review. In accordance with the Rule 10.1(c)(2) of the Court's Local Rules, plaintiff shall promptly notify the Clerk's Office and all parties or their counsel, in writing, of any change in his address. Plaintiff's failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on plaintiff along with ablank IFP application and a blank inmate authorization form. Signed by U.S. District Judge Glenn T Suddaby on 1/12/2024. (Copy served upon plaintiff along w/ a blank IFP application and inmate authorization form via regular mail) (sal)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Khalid Miller. (meb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Catholic Charities, Jane Doe, John Doe filed by Khalid Miller.(meb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
