United States of America v. $30,098.45 in U.S. Currency
United States of America |
$30,098.45 in U.S. Currency |
5:2024cv00131 |
January 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Lawrence E Kahn |
Miroslav Lovric |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America of a copy of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem, the Warrant for Arrest of Articles in Rem, and the Notice to Potential Claimant via United States Postal Service, certified and regular mail to Bay E. Rosario. (Conger, Elizabeth) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America of a copy of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem, the Warrant for Arrest of Articles in Rem, and the Notice to Potential Claimant via United States Postal Service, certified and regular mail to Jamie Dening, attorney for Bay Rosario. (Conger, Elizabeth) |
Filing 7 SERVICE by Publication of Notice of Forfeiture; Last publication date February 29, 2024 in the government's internet website: www.forfeiture.gov; last day to file a claim is March 31, 2024. filed by United States of America (Conger, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN of United States Marshals Service Returned executed on 2/5/2024 Arrest of property (CATS # 22-DEA-695302) $30,098.45 in U.S. Currency. In USMS Custody since 9/16/2022. (ztc) |
Filing 5 WARRANT of Arrest in Rem #2 Returned executed on 2/5/2024 by United States Marshals. (ztc) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America of a copy of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem, the Warrant for Arrest of Articles in Rem and the Notice to Potential Claimant via United States Postal Service, certified and regular mail to Jamie Dening, attorney for Bay Rosario. (Conger, Elizabeth) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America of a copy of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem, the Warrant for Arrest of Articles in Rem and the Notice to Potential Claimant via United States Postal Service, certified and regular mail to Kadesha Carter, and Jamie Dening, attorney for Bay E. Rosario. (Conger, Elizabeth) |
Filing 2 WARRANT of Arrest in Rem issued (No hearing date) filed by United States of America. (ztc) |
Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM (Fee waived) against $30,098.45 in U.S. Currency filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. $30,098.45 in U.S. Currency | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth A. Conger |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: $30,098.45 in U.S. Currency | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.