Hluska v. Barnhart
6:2006cv00485 |
April 19, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Utica Office |
Lawrence E. Kahn |
Randolph F. Treece |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 DECISION & ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs cross-Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part and REMANDED for reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 03/25/09. (sas) |
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS -- It is recommended that the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings should be DENIED; plaintiff's cross motion for judgment on the pleadings should be DENIED in part and granted in part and remanded for reconsideration. Objections must be filed within 10 days. Objections to R&R due by 3/2/2009 Case Review Deadline 3/5/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 2/13/09. (mnm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hluska v. Barnhart | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.