Plante v. Barnhart
6:2006cv00972 |
August 10, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Utica Office |
Lawrence E. Kahn |
George H. Lowe |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 DECISION and ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 12) is REJECTED in part, to the extent it recommends that Plaintiff has forfeited his objection to the Vocational Experts qualifications, and is otherwise ADOPTED; and it is further ORDER ED, that the Defendants Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Plaintiffs Motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED in part, and the case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings in accordance with the Report-Recommendation. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on July 02, 2009. (sas) |
Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Recommending the Pltf's motion for judgment on the pleadings be GRANTED IN PART and that Deft's motion for judgment on the pleadings be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 6/3/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 5/19/09. (amt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Plante v. Barnhart | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.