Chen v. The City of Syracuse et al
6:2006cv01143 |
September 22, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Utica Office |
George H. Lowe |
Neal P. McCurn |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 97 JUDGMENT - in favor of The City of Syracuse, Harry Burns, John Reilly against Ling-Rong Chen. The Court awards the City of Syracuse and the Police Officer defendants, as prevailing parties against Ling-Rong-Chen the amount set forth in the submitted Bill of Costs, less the amount requested for Investigative Services for a total allowable cost of 3,997.80. Signed by Marie N. Marra, Deputy Clerk. |
Filing 96 SUMMARY ORDER -- the Court hereby awards the City of Syracuse and the police officer defendants, as prevailing parties, the amount set forth on the submitted Bill of Costs, 94 Bill of Costs filed by The City of Syracuse, Harry Burns, John Reilly, l ess the amount requested for Investigative Services, for a total allowable cost of $3,997.80. The Clerk is instructed to include these costs $3,997.80, in the judgment for the defendants. Signed by Senior Judge Neal P. McCurn on 6/22/09. (mnm, ) |
Filing 64 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Neal P. McCurn on 3/2/09. (amt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chen v. The City of Syracuse et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.