Chen v. The City of Syracuse et al
Case Number: 6:2006cv01143
Filed: September 22, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Utica Office
Presiding Judge: George H. Lowe
Presiding Judge: Neal P. McCurn
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 97 JUDGMENT - in favor of The City of Syracuse, Harry Burns, John Reilly against Ling-Rong Chen. The Court awards the City of Syracuse and the Police Officer defendants, as prevailing parties against Ling-Rong-Chen the amount set forth in the submitted Bill of Costs, less the amount requested for Investigative Services for a total allowable cost of 3,997.80. Signed by Marie N. Marra, Deputy Clerk.
June 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 96 SUMMARY ORDER -- the Court hereby awards the City of Syracuse and the police officer defendants, as prevailing parties, the amount set forth on the submitted Bill of Costs, 94 Bill of Costs filed by The City of Syracuse, Harry Burns, John Reilly, l ess the amount requested for Investigative Services, for a total allowable cost of $3,997.80. The Clerk is instructed to include these costs $3,997.80, in the judgment for the defendants. Signed by Senior Judge Neal P. McCurn on 6/22/09. (mnm, )
March 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Neal P. McCurn on 3/2/09. (amt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chen v. The City of Syracuse et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?