Payne v. Jones et al
James Edward Payne |
Officer Brandon Jones, Officer John Doe #1, C. Allen Pylman, City of Utica and City of Utica Police Department |
6:2008cv00143 |
February 7, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Oneida |
David N. Hurd |
David E. Peebles |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 117 ORDER: that deft Brandon Jones motion, joined by the deft City of Utica, for judgment as a matter of law or in the alternative for a new trial is DENIED; Pltf may file an application for attorneys fees on or before November 10, 2009; Defts may file a response on or before November 18, 2009, and no reply will be permitted; Pltfs application will be on submit; Thereafter, the Clerk will be directed to enter judgment.Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/3/2009. (see) |
Filing 62 ORDER: defts' 32 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED w/regard to the incident at Faxton Hospital and all claims regarding Faxton Hospital are DISMISSED; defts' motion for summary judgment is DENIED in all other respects; deft Brandon J ones' 51 Motion to Bifurcate is GRANTED; trial against deft Brandon Jones and John Abel will proceed on 9/14/09 as previously scheduled. Immediately following a verdict against either or both individual defts, trial of the Monell claims will proceed against defts Pylman, City of Utica and Utica Police Department. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 6/30/09. (cbm, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.