Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Munich Reinsurance America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Utica Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: Munich Reinsurance America, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2012cv00196
Filed: January 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Utica Office
County: Oneida
Presiding Judge: Andrew T. Baxter
Presiding Judge: Lawrence E. Kahn
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 471 ORDER denying 462 Motion for Bill of Costs. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 2/27/2020. (rjb,)
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 454 ORDER that Utica's request for entry of declaratory judgment is DENIED and that the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Munich in Utica I, 6:12-cv-196 and that Munich's request for entry of declaratory judgment is DENIED and that the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Utica in Utica II, 6:13-cv-743. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 3/29/2019. (rjb, )
June 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 391 ORDER denying Munich's 332 Motion in Limine to preclude evidence of follow the fortunes and follow the settlements; Munich's 344 Motion in Limine concerning Utica's experts is Granted in part and Denied in part; Munichs 346 M otion in Limine concerning general evidentiary issues is Granted in part and Denied in part; Utica's 352 Motion in Limine to preclude evidence and arguments related to Munichs and Uticas expense obligations as barred by collateral estoppel is Denied; Utica's 353 Motion in Limine to preclude evidence concerning the not covered by provision in the Umbrellas is Denied; Utica's 354 Motion in Limine to preclude evidence of aggregate limits is Denied; Utica's 355 Moti on in Limine to preclude the admission of its privilege log and the transcript of Magistrate Judge Baxters January 20, 2016, hearing is Granted. The Court reserves ruling as to impeachment; Utica's 356 Motion in Limine to preclude cumulative expert testimony is Denied without prejudice to renewal at trial. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 6/27/2018. (jlm)
May 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 341 ORDER denying 330 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 5/23/18. (rjb, )
September 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 22) for summary judgment is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 29) for continuation of discovery is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 27) to strike is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on September 30, 2013. (sas) Modified on 10/1/2013 (sas).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Munich Reinsurance America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Utica Mutual Insurance Company
Represented By: Syed S. Ahmad
Represented By: Walter J. Andrews
Represented By: Patrick M. McDermott
Represented By: Joseph J. Saltarelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Munich Reinsurance America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?