Penree et al v. City of Utica, New York et al
| Daniel Penree and D-M.W. |
| City of Utica, New York, City of Utica Police Department, City of Utica Police Department Chief of Police, Mark Williams, Watson, Ciccone, Skabiniski, John Does and Jane Does |
| 6:2013cv01323 |
| October 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Utica Office |
| Oneida |
| Andrew T. Baxter |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER re 73 Motion in Limine; 79 Motion in Limine: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiffs' motion in limine is DENIED without prejudice to renew with respect to the admissibility of Plaintiff Penree's prior arrests and incidents; and the Court further RESERVES decision on Plaintiffs' motion in limine with respect to the admissibility of Defendants' expert's testimony; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion in limine is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice to renew; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 8/10/17. (ban)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/4/16. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
