Turczyn v. City of Utica et al
| Kylie Ann Turczyn |
| City of Utica Police Dept., City of Utica and Elizabeth Shanley |
| 6:2013cv01357 |
| October 31, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Utica Office |
| Oneida |
| Andrew T. Baxter |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 19) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: GRANTED with respect to all claims alleged as against the City of Utica Police Dept. and the Clerk is di rected to terminate the City of Utica Police Dept. from this action; and GRANTED with respect to Turczyn's Monell claim against the City (Am. Compl. 51-58), which is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the Clerk is directed to termin ate the City of Utica from this action; and GRANTED with respect to all of Turczyn's pendant state law claims, (Am. Compl. 59-74), which are hereby DISMISSED; and DENIED in all other respects; and it is further ORDERED that the sole remaining defendant, Shanley, shall file an appropriate responsive pleading within the time allotted by the rules; and it is further ORDERED that the parties shall contact Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter in order to schedule further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/26/2014. (jel, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
