Halo Optical Products, Inc. et al v. Liberty Sport, Inc.
Plaintiff: Halo Optical Products, Inc. and Halo Sports and Safety, Inc.
Defendant: Liberty Sport, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2014cv00282
Filed: March 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Utica Office
County: Fulton
Presiding Judge: Mae A. D'Agostino
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 156 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 122 Motion to clarify or modify the preliminary injunction: The Court hereby ORDERS that Liberty's motion to clarify or modify the preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 122) is GRANTED; and the Court furthe r ORDERS that as long as the parties' agreements pertaining to the trademark remain in effect, Liberty is ENJOINED during the pendency of this action from ordering, purchasing, marketing or selling REC SPECS eyewear, or sports protective ey ewear that competes with REC SPECS eyewear, or (2) if Liberty does order, purchase, market or sell REC SPECS eyewear, or sports protective eyewear that competes with REC SPECS eyewear, that it do so in accordance with the parties' agreements, a nd the custom and practice implementing them as discussed in the Court's previous orders; and the Court further ORDERS that if the parties' agreements are effectively terminated and Liberty relinquishes its right to use the REC SPECS tra demark, Liberty is ENJOINED during the pendency of this action from ordering, purchasing, marketing or selling eyewear bearing the REC SPECS trademark; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/11/2017. (ban)
March 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 127 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 103 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 112 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/22/17. (ban)
February 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 102 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 87 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Liberty's motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 87) is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of the Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 2/22/16. (ban)
March 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 38 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/5/15. (ban)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 37 Motion for Modification of the Preliminary Injunction to require security from Plaintiffs: The Court hereby ORDERS that this Court's Memorandum-Decision and Order dated June 24, 2014 (Dkt.No. 34) is he reby amended to indicate that Plaintiffs are not required to post a bond; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendant's motion for modification of the preliminary injunction to require security from Plaintiffs is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 7/23/2014. (ban)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Halo Optical Products, Inc. et al v. Liberty Sport, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Halo Optical Products, Inc.
Represented By: G. Kimball Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Halo Sports and Safety, Inc.
Represented By: G. Kimball Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Sport, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Sherrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?