Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. American Re-Insurance Company
Utica Mutual Insurance Company |
American Re-Insurance Company |
6:2014cv01558 |
December 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Utica Office |
Oneida |
Mae A. D'Agostino |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 13 Motion to Remand to State Court: The Court hereby ORDERS that Utica's motion to remand is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that this action is REMANDED to the New York State Supreme Court in Oneid a County for all further proceedings; and the Court further ORDERS that th Clerk is directed to mail a certified copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of New York in Oneida County and instruct him t o file the Memorandum-Decision and Order in Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Am. Re-Insurance Co. a/k/a Munich Reinsurance Am. Co., Inc., and Transatlantic Reinsurance Co., IndexNo. CA2013-2587; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall cl ose this case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 4/27/2015. (ban) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.